Military reference books and manuals (2009-2023, Volume 2) - page 33

 

  Index      Manuals     Military reference books and manuals (2009-2023, Volume 2)

 

Search            copyright infringement  

 

   

 

   

 

Content      ..     31      32      33      34     ..

 

 

 

Military reference books and manuals (2009-2023, Volume 2) - page 33

 

 

Chapter V 

V-12 JP 

3-15.1 

management board is chaired by the deputy commanding general.  It is designed to allocate 
resources, to include ISR, to support the overall C-IED effort.  Membership includes the 
JTF’s primary staff and senior representatives of the component commands.  The 
management board, if established, reviews and decides upon the recommendations 
developed by the J-3’s (or C-IED task forces) C-IED working group.  The C-IED 
management board provides general officer-level updates on the IED threat and trends and 
MSC concerns relating to C-IED efforts in equipment, training and intelligence.  
Recommendations produced by the management board include: 

(1)  (U) C-IED-specific IO recommendations. 

(2)  (U) C-IED equipment distribution recommendations. 

(3)  (U) Decisions on C-IED technology requirements. 

(4)  (U) Priorities for asset allocation as pertains to C-IED efforts (ISR, air 

platforms, route clearance, and EOD efforts). 

c.  (U) 

J-3 C-IED Working Group.

  Depending on the commander’s requirements, J-3 

recommends the formation of a C-IED working group (Figure V-7).  The working group, 
consisting of representatives from the J-2, J-2 collection management, J-2 plans, J-7, J-3 
plans, J-3 operations, C-IED task force, and other members, as required, is tasked to work 
specific issues related to the C-IED plan.  These issues can include anything from developing 
major refinements to the C-IED plan to developing the command response to major 
developments in the adversary’s employment of IEDs.  While the working group usually 
focuses on a specific IED-related issue of significant importance to the JTF, it can become a 
standing body to establish, plan, coordinate, and manage the overall C-IED initiatives.  IED 
working groups may also be established at the MSCs.  MSC-level working groups are 
designed to identify C-IED-related issues that require JTF-level action/intervention.  MSC-
level issues are presented to the J-3 C-IED working group via their working group 
representatives. 

d.  (U) 

Component Command-Level C-IED Working Groups.

  When required, IED 

working groups are also established at the joint force component commands.  These working 
groups are responsible for focusing C-IED efforts within their respective operational area to 
mitigate current and future IED threats. 

e.  (U) 

Specialized Cells for C-IED Task Force Operations.

  There are a number of 

specialized cells within the C-IED task force organization that can be created to develop 
policy and provide direction for the JTF’s overall C-IED operations.  These cells are 
normally integrated into the C-IED task force’s principal staff (primarily the operations and 
plans and policy staffs).  These cells include: 

(1)  (U) 

C-IED Intelligence Cell.

  Discussed in detail in paragraph 2, 

“Intelligence,” this cell is a specialized intelligence cell created to address a wide range of 
issues related to the command’s C-IED plan.  The cell, normally placed under C-IED task 
force J-2, can be assigned a variety of tasks from IED event analysis, determining IED 
trends, and IED pattern analysis. 

 Staff 

Responsibilities 

(U) 

V-13 

(2)  (U) 

Plans and Policy Cell.

  The C-IED task force J-3’s plans and policy cell is 

responsible for developing the command’s C-IED plan and for ensuring that the plan is 
closely tied to the command’s overall COIN plan.  The cell’s tasks include: 

(a)  (U) Developing the C-IED plan. 

(b)  (U) In accordance with the CJTF’s policy guidance, establishing the 

command’s policies on IED event reporting to include timelines, IED data collection 
standards, and dissemination of information. 

(c)  (U) In cooperation with the training cell, establishing policies to update and 

disseminate C-IED TTP force-wide on a regular basis.  Employ specialized mobile training 

 

Figure V-7.  (U) Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Working Group  

COUNTER-IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE 

WORKING GROUP

Training Cell

J-2

J-3

J-7

MSC

C-IED

Task Force

Defeat the Device

Train the Force

Attack the Network

Plans and Policy Cell

J-2, J-3, J-7, J-9, SJA, MSCs, C-IED Task Force, 

HN, PA

Technology 

Cell

J-2

J-3

J-7

MSC

C-IED

Task Force

Assessment Cell

J-2, J-3, J-7, J-9, MSC, IO, JIEDDO,

CITP, C-IED Task Force

LEGEND

C-IED

counter-improvised explosive device

CITP

counter-IED targeting program

HN

host nation

IED improvised 

explosive 

device

IO

information operations

J-2

intelligence directorate of a joint staff

J-3

operations directorate of a joint staff

J-7

engineering staff section

J-9

civil-military operations staff section

JIEDDO

Joint IED Defeat Organization

MSC

major subordinate command

PA

public affairs

SJA

staff judge advocate

Chapter V 

V-14 JP 

3-15.1 

teams to routinely conduct assistance visits to subordinate units providing the latest 
information on IED-related TTP and appropriate countermeasures. 

(d)  (U) 

Technology Cell.

  This cell is responsible for reviewing friendly force 

protection and C-IED technologies, identifying potential shortfalls, and recommending near-
term solutions.  It forwards all short-term recommendations through operations for 
implementation within the JTF and provides longer-term recommendations through the chain 
of command and C-IED task force for submission to JIEDDO for action. 

(e)  (U) 

Training Cell.

  This cell is responsible for reviewing friendly force 

C-IED training programs and TTP, identifying potential shortfalls, and recommending near-
term (that can be addressed by the force’s organic training capabilities, i.e., unit-level TTP or 
by mobile training teams) and long-term (for service or joint predeployment training) 
solutions.  Near-term recommendations are forwarded through the J-3 for implementation 
within the command.  Longer-term recommendations are forwarded, through the chain of 
command, to DOD level for action by the appropriate Service. 

f.  (U) 

Targeting.

  The C-IED working group plays a critical role in developing and 

recommending C-IED-related targets for lethal and nonlethal engagement.  The C-IED 
working group develops critical vulnerability candidates in each function area within the 
overall IED network.  Actionable targets and targets for development are matched to these 
critical vulnerabilities.  Targets for development steer requirements for intelligence.  
Actionable targets that, if actioned together, will disable a critical vulnerability, are 
prioritized in a list of recommended targets with recommended means of engagement (lethal 
and nonlethal).  This list is forwarded for consideration and action by the command’s 
targeting board. 

6.  (U) Coordinating with Supporting Theater- and National-Level Counter-Improvised 
Explosive Device Organizations 

a.  (U) In organizing the operational area for the C-IED effort, the commander will have 

the ability to call upon assistance from highly specialized theater military, DOD, national, 
and interagency assets that can deploy elements forward to augment the JTF staff.  The 
theater, national, DOD, and interagency assets can perform a wide variety of functions 
designed to degrade the insurgents’ IED infrastructure from detailed forensic/technical 
evaluations of IEDs, to managing an HVI targeting effort.  The major theater- and national-
level C-IED enablers include:  

b.  (U) CEXC 

(1)  (U) The CEXC is a Navy-led task organized unit created to meet technical and 

forensic intelligence requirements for the combatant commander.  It provides expert-level 
technical and forensic exploitation and analysis of IEDs and associated components, 
improvised weapons, and other weapons systems in order to determine enemy tactics, 
identify IED trends and bomb makers, and assist in the development of defensive and 
offensive C-IED measures.  Depending on the theater requirements, the CEXC construct is 
often augmented by law enforcement professionals (LEPs), CITP personnel, intelligence 

 Staff 

Responsibilities 

(U) 

V-15 

analysts, and MNFs work closely with other forensic/exploitation labs and other government 
departments and agencies to provide more synergetic and extensive exploitation capabilities 
to the combatant commander.  Some of the capabilities include: 

(a)  (FOUO)  Conducting  first-line  technical and forensic exploitation and 

evaluation of IEDs and components, and preparing detailed laboratory reports for all 
exploited materiel. 

(b)  (FOUO)  Providing  technical  assistance and advice on EOD, force 

protection, and combat tactics regarding the threat posed by IEDs and counter-IED TTP. 

(c)  (FOUO) Providing detailed forensic analysis and device profiles to assist 

the targeting process. 

(d)  (FOUO) Providing technical assistance to support the interrogation of IED-

related detainees. 

(e)  (FOUO)  Assisting  in  operations  against suspected bomb makers and 

transporters, IED factories, storage locations, and training sites. 

(f)  (FOUO) Providing briefings, component familiarization, personnel, and 

subject matter expert support. 

(g)  (FOUO) Conduct on-scene evaluations of significant IED incidents in 

order to collect evidence and intelligence on IED-related TTP. 

(h)  (FOUO) Support site exploitation operations to include accompanying 

units on raids and searches to exploit caches. 

(2)  (FOUO) When combined with on-scene reporting from the WITs, EOD teams, 

detainee reporting, and unit-level information, the CEXC can provide a comprehensive 
picture of adversary IED developments and TTP that can be used to modify friendly TTP 
and force protection initiatives. 

(3)  (FOUO) CEXC exploitation reports are provided to various US national and 

allied agencies for further technical analysis and EOD-related database development.  
Additionally, these reports form the basis for targeting programs directed against key nodes 
in the adversary’s IED infrastructure.  The main customer for CEXC reports is the TDC in 
the J-2 JIOC, which also manages the profiles.  CEXC reports are also provided to unit-level 
intelligence cells, and are available through the CEXC Web site.  In addition, CEXC 
generates spot reports for new devices and technical bulletins, which are educational in 
nature.  CEXC analysis provides only a piece of the total insurgent puzzle.  Units must fuse 
the CEXC information with EOD and WIT reports and with their own HUMINT and tactical 
intelligence to fully understand the bomb maker network. 

c.  (U) 

HVI Targeting Program.

  The HVI targeting program is a combatant 

commander’s resource that works closely with the JTF and is designed to capture key 
adversary personnel including those contributing to the adversary’s IED activities.  The HVI 

Chapter V 

V-16 JP 

3-15.1 

targeting program is a joint, interagency task force that plans, manages, and conducts the 
targeting of HVIs who are in or transiting the operational area in order to capture key 
individuals who are significantly influencing the operations, directing and/or funding 
transnational terrorists and local insurgents.  The task force is manned by a variety of 
specialists from the JTF and from supporting interagency partners.  Interagency participants 
could include an on-site team with representation from DOD investigations, legal, DHS, FBI, 
and the Department of the Treasury.  Interagency intelligence reachback for analytical 
support would also be provided.  Liaison officers from the major participants in the JTF 
would be present to assist in organizing forces to take action against identified targets. 

d.  (U) 

Threat Finance Exploitation (TFE) Unit.

  The TFE unit works with DOD and 

non-DOD intelligence, law enforcement, and regulatory agencies that are responsible for 
taking action against terrorist and insurgent financial networks.  The unit is an integral part 
of the overall national program to detect, collect, and process information on, and target, 
disrupt, or destroy the adversary’s financial systems and networks.  As part of the C-IED 
effort, the TFE effort denies the adversary the uninterrupted financial resources needed to 
obtain IED-related supplies and support their personnel (bomb makers, transporters, 
emplacers).  At the JTF level, threat finance information derived from raids, cache 
exploitation, and interrogations is analyzed and passed through intelligence channels to the 
TFE unit for target development and further exploitation in coordination with national 
resources.  Appropriate targeting recommendations are then passed back to the JTF for 
action using lethal and nonlethal means. 

 
 

VI-1 

CHAPTER VI 

COUNTER-IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE TASK FORCE (U) 

1.  (U) Introduction 

(U) As an alternative to using the JTF staff to manage the C-IED effort, the CJTF can 

establish a task  force,  integrating tactical-  and operational-level organizations and 
streamlining communications under a single headquarters whose total focus is on the C-IED 
effort.  The task force construct is useful when a large number of C-IED assets (EOD; WIT; 
C-IED  training teams; and  chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield 
explosives [CBRNE] response teams [CRTs], formerly identified as technical escort teams 
and their supporting organizations, [COIC, LEP, operations research and systems analysis 
{ORSA}, joint expeditionary team {JET}, etc.]) have been deployed to support large-scale, 
long duration operations.  The organization and employment of the task force will depend on 
the mission, the threat and the available C-IED enabling forces.  Counter-IED resources are 
scalable to meet not only the size of the supported JTF but also the mission and phase of the 
operation (Figure VI-1). 

2.  (U) Organization 

a.  (U) A C-IED  task force  is normally built around an 

 

appropriately augmented 

brigade-level headquarters or its equivalent (EOD group, ordnance group, engineer brigade, 
maneuver enhancement brigade,  Army  EOD  battalion  or Navy EOD mobile unit).  In 
addition to controlling the subordinate EOD organizations and battalions, the C-IED task 
force commander is given operational control (OPCON) or tactical control (TACON) of the 
JTF’s specialized C-IED assets to include WIT, CEXC, CITP, COIC, C-IED training teams, 
and the technical escort detachment.  The combination  of EOD assets with specialized 
C-IED enablers allows the task force  to conduct focused C-IED network analysis and 
targeting, provide direct support packages of C-IED enablers to BCTs, and organize and 
conduct unit-level C-IED training programs.   

b.  (U) In establishing a task force to manage C-IED operations, the CJTF will align 

supporting resources to provide the task force  commander with the means necessary to 
accomplish the mission.  Under the task force construct, EOD units are normally OPCON 
and/or TACON to the C-IED  task force  commander.  The EOD battalion  continues to 
provide EOD teams in direct support of the MSCs.  MSCs continue to provide combat 
service support (CSS) to the assigned EOD team.  The EOD battalion provides specialized 
technical support to the deployed EOD teams and may also be tasked to provide CSS for 
WIT.  An augmented EOD battalion headquarters is well suited to form the nucleus of the 
maneuver division’s C-IED effort, but as previously mentioned, this task could be filled by 
any battalion staff headquarters augmented with technical experts and additional enablers.  In 
addition to the JTF’s attached EOD units that form the basis for the task force, the following 
C-IED enabling assets will normally be assigned to or under the control of the C-IED task 
force: 

 

 

Chapter VI 

VI-2 

JP 3-15.1 

 

 

 

Figure VI-1.  (U) Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Scalable Team 

COUNTER-IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE SCALABLE TEAM

LEGEND

AAB

advise and assist brigade

BN

battalion

BDE

brigade

C-IED

counter-improvised explosive device

CEXC

combined explosives exploitation cell

CITP

counter-improvised explosive device 

targeting program

CJTF

combined joint task force

CMD

command

COIC

counter-improvised explosive device 

operations integration center

CREW

counter radio-controlled IED 

electronic warfare

CSE

counter-improvised explosive device 

support element

DTK

Defense Intelligence Agency 

laboratory

EOD

explosive ordnance disposal

ECM

electronic countermeasures

EWO

electronic warfare officer

FWD

forward

HN

host nation

IO

information operations

IED

improvised explosive device

J-2

intelligence directorate of a joint staff

JET

joint expeditionary team

JIEDDO Joint IED Defeat Organization
JOC

joint operations center

LEP

law enforcement professional

NCOIC

noncommissioned officer in charge

OIC

officer in charge

ORSA

operations research and systems 

analysis

PST

provincial security team

RCP

route clearance patrol

SAP

special access program

SME

subject matter expert

WIT

weapons intelligence team

CJTF

CJTF

C-IED Joint 

Task Force

AAB Cell

C-IED team focus

Attached from supported unit

AAB Cell

C-IED

Task Force

C-IED Cell

C-IED JOC

CMD Group

Joint Staff

COIC FWD

WIT
LEP

ORSA

IO/SAP

CREW ECM

EWO

CEXC

CITP

CSEs

EOD BN

RCP

WIT

DTK Lab
AAB Cell

Liaison

HN Trainers

CMD Group

Joint Staff

COIC FWD

WIT
LEP

ORSA

IO/SAP

CREW

EWO

CEXC

CITP

BDE CSE

EOD BN

RCP

DTK Lab

Liaison

HN Trainers

CMD Group

Joint Staff

COIC FWD

WIT
LEP

ORSA

IO/SAP

CITP

BDE CSE

EOD BN

RCP

DTK Lab

Liaison

HN Trainers

COIC FWD

WIT
LEP

ORSA

IO/SAP

CMD Group

Joint Staff

CREW ECM

EWO

CEXC

CITP

BDE CSE

EOD BN

RCP

Liaison

HN Trainers

OIC

NCOIC

J-2

Liaison

COIC FWD

WIT
LEP

ORSA

IO/SAP

HN Trainers

OIC

NCOIC

J-2

COIC

JIEDDO SME

JET

Reachback

PST

Trainers

Liaison

IO/SAP

HN Trainers

Host Nation 

Training

Phase 5 

ENABLE CIVIL 

AUTHORITIES

Transition

Phase 4 

STABILITY

Exploitation 

Level 2/3

Phase 3 

DOMINATE

Exploitation 

Level 2

Phase 2

SEIZE

Analytic 

Structure

Phase 1

DETER

Phase 0

SHAPE

Coordinator, 

IO, and 

Trainers

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Task Force (U) 

VI-3 

(1)  (U) The JTF

 C-IED intelligence cell

 is a JTF J-2 asset that is detailed to the 

task force commander.  The cell consists of the operations section, a network infrastructure 
analysis and targeting section, the forward deployed CITP cell, the CEXC, and the WIT.  
The  task force C-IED intelligence cell is the primary agency responsible for fusion of 
technical assessments, forensic analyses, and all-source threat intelligence related to the IED 
threat within the operational area.  Working with the JTF corps analysis and control element 
and the component commands, the cell develops all-source intelligence products designed to 
target insurgent IED networks and disrupt the insurgent’s ability to effectively employ IEDs 
as the weapon of choice.  The task force C-IED intelligence cell also develops and 
disseminates information on the latest developments in threat TTP and advises the JTF on 
IED risk mitigation.   

(2)  (U) 

JTF IO Staff.

  The IO staff provides focused IO planning and support to 

the C-IED TF commander.  They coordinate and deconflict related IO capabilities with other 
staff functions and supporting agencies and organizations. 

(3)  (U) 

CEXC.

  The CEXC is normally assigned to the CJTF, who then delegates 

OPCON to the C-IED task force commander.  The CEXC is the core of the task force’s 
C-IED technical intelligence (TECHINT) element facilitating targeting of the adversary’s 
IED infrastructure.  Taskings for the CEXC are developed by the CJTF’s J-2. 

(4)  (U) 

CBRN Response Teams.

 CBRN response teams provide weapons of mass 

destruction (WMD)  site and chemical weapons assessment and exploitation support 
throughout the theater. 

(5)  (U) 

WIT.

  The WITs or C-IED teams are assigned to

 the C-IED 

task force

.  

Normally an EOD company, with a direct support WIT, will be placed in direct support of 
each  BCT.  

The  detachments normally  will be placed OPCON to the C-IED  task force 

commander.

 

(6)  (U) 

CITP.

  The NGIC forward deployed CITP cell is assigned to the task force 

and acts as the focal point for C-IED intelligence fusion.  The detachments normally will be 
placed OPCON to the C-IED task force commander. 

(7)  (U) 

C-IED Training Teams.

  The JTF EHCC’s training teams normally are 

placed OPCON to the C-IED task force commander.   

(8)  

(U) 

Joint CREW Unit.

  

The CREW is assigned to the theater C-IED task 

force.  In coordination with the JTF EWCC, the CREW neutralizes the radio-controlled 
improvised explosive device (RCIED) threat by deconflicting EMS use; conducting EW 
coordination in support of current operations, training, and readiness; and providing fielding 
support down to the BCT level.  The detachments normally will be placed OPCON to the 
C-IED task force commander. 

(9)  (U) 

COIC-Forward.

  JIEDDO deploys COIC teams forward with the C-IED 

task force to enable reach back to the full capabilities of COIC analytic centers in theater and 
at the JIEDDO COIC in the continental United States (CONUS) to enable more precise 
attacks by the supported commander to defeat networks that employ IEDs. 

Chapter VI 

VI-4 

JP 3-15.1 

(10)  (U) 

JET.  

The JET supports all echelons of the joint force, interagency, and 

multinational partners.  Its purpose is to train, advise, observe, analyze, and to collect and 
disseminate TTP, lessons learned, and best practices to mitigate the IED threat.  They will 
normally operate in two- to three-person teams and be placed OPCON to the task force’s 
C-IED commander. 

3.  (U) Roles and Responsibilities 

a.  (U)  The mission of the C-IED task force is to enable and support the coordination of 

the JTF’s C-IED operations to create the conditions that will deny the IED cells’ freedom of 
action,  reduce  the IED cells’ effectiveness, and lower overall IED activity to a level 
commensurate with the HN security forces’ capabilities.  It does so by commanding and 
controlling specialized C-IED forces as well as coordinating and synchronizing JTF-level 
C-IED operations, intelligence, technology and training initiatives throughout the operational 
area.  The C-IED  task force optimizes C-IED operations by fusing IED defeat-related 
intelligence, capabilities, training, equipment, and EOD forces in one organization at the JTF 
level.  The task force acts as the single point of contact for C-IED matters within the 
operational area.  The task force can also be tasked to develop the JTF’s C-IED CONOPS 
and C-IED OPLAN.  The C-IED task force’s major missions include: 

(1)  (U) Execution and synchronization of C-IED operations by coordinating and 

employing C-IED forces and enablers in support of the JTF’s C-IED plan.  This includes 
managing the analytical and intelligence assets that feed into the targeting and  AtN 
processes.  The C-IED task force provides the CJTF with C-IED subject matter expertise. 

(2)  

(U) Providing C-IED operations planning support.  By coordinating with the 

JTF planning staff, ensuring that the JTF integrates C-IED considerations into its operational 
plans.  Recommending C-IED operational priorities. 

 

(3)  

(U) Exercising command and control (C2) over C-IED and EOD resources.  

When C-IED and EOD resources are placed in direct support of component maneuver units, 
the C-IED task force will maintain responsibility for ensuring those resources have logistical, 
administrative, planning, and communications support to accomplish their mission-essential 
tasks. 

(4)  

(U) Managing and developing policy for the WTI and IED exploitation process 

and managing the IED exploitation architecture.  This includes ensuring that the results of 
the collection, analysis, and dissemination of TECHINT, biometric information, forensics, 
and media exploitation feed into the C-IED targeting process.  It also includes the 
synchronization of C-IED exploitation in the JOA  and the tracking of exploitation labs, 
personnel, requirements, and forensic material.

 

(5)  (U) Conducting assessments of C-IED capabilities and gaps based on threat and 

operational environment.     

(6)  

(U) Capturing and analyzing current TTP and best practices in order to support 

in-theater training updates  and refresher training.  Coordinating  refresher training and 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Task Force (U) 

VI-5 

training upon reception, staging, onward movement, and integration (RSOI) of incoming 
units.  Providing support for this training to multinational partners.

  

 

(7)  (U)  Providing constant relevant feedback based on the threat, operational 

environment, and best practices that feeds into predeployment and IED awareness training.  

(8)  

(U) Organizing the intelligence assets required to determine IED threats and 

provide analysis on IED cells and sources to feed the targeting process.  Assisting units with 
the employment and integration of C-IED operations within COIN.  

(9)  

(U) Conducting all-source intelligence analysis to build an understanding of the 

enemy’s operations and IED system.  Intelligence analysts can gain access to multiple data 
feeds using COIC tools and taking advantage of US-based reachback support.  

(10)  

(U) Compiling analytically derived, empirically supported, quantitative 

assessments in support of decision making with regard to targeting and C-IED planning to 
enhance effectiveness of AtN efforts.  Providing impact assessments of operations and 
solutions on the IED networks.  

(11)  

(U) Developing  networks, nominating  C-IED targets, developing  target 

packages, and participating  in the JTF’s joint targeting board to target IED cells and 
individuals.   

(12)  

(U) Developing  and maintaining the ability to share pertinent intelligence 

across various networks to enable all friendly forces to make necessary linkages that will 
support both AtN and defeat the device LOOs.  

(13)  

(U) Conducting liaison and sharing information with other organizations 

involved in the C-IED effort. 

(14)  (U) Ensuring that there is a unified and coordinated effort for C-IED across 

MNFs. 

(15)  (U) Enabling HN training and information sharing to facilitate a transition to 

the C-IED effort. 

(16)  (U) Supporting the JTF’s strategic communication implementation and IO 

activities. 

(17)  (U) Integrating  material and nonmaterial solutions to include CONOPs, 

concepts of employment, and training and sustainment plan development.  Conducting 
ongoing assessments of material and nonmaterial solutions to influence future planning.  

b.  (U)  The C-IED task force coordinates the overall conduct of C-IED operations 

through the JTF J-3.  C-IED task force assets (EOD battalions/mobile units and companies 
augmented by C-IED enabling assets) deployed in support of maneuver units coordinate their 
respective operations through the supported unit’s J-3/battalion or brigade operations staff 
officers (S-3s).  Through participation in the JTF’s (and supported unit’s) staff planning 

Chapter VI 

VI-6 

JP 3-15.1 

cycle, including applicable boards, working groups, and cells, the C-IED  task force 
synchronizes and integrates its operations into the JTF’s and supported unit’s overall scheme 
of maneuver. 

c.  (U)  Service engineer units conducting route clearance operations either in direct 

support of the maneuver brigades (or their equivalent formation) or on an area support basis 
will normally coordinate for C-IED task force support through the supported headquarters’ 
J-3/S-3.  Engineers identify their C-IED support requirements through participation in the 
unit’s C-IED working groups and planning cells. 

4.  (U//FOUO) Task Force Intelligence Integrating Functions 

a.  (U) One of the most complex challenges in organizing the C-IED effort is in 

gathering, analyzing, and disseminating information that is relevant to each echelon of the 
command, from the BCTs that must stay current on the latest adversary IED TTP, to the 
command that is organizing the fight to defeat the IED supporting infrastructure. 

b.  (U) C-IED Intelligence Cell 

(1)  (U) 

Organization.

  Consists of the J-2’s C-IED fusion and TDCs.  The cell is 

responsible for integrating the activities of a multitude of intelligence collection and analysis 
functions to support the task force’s many activities.  The cell has a number of specific 
responsibilities including: 

(a)  (U) Recommending the focused employment of intelligence collection 

assets against the adversary’s IED infrastructure. 

(b)  (U) Serving as the all-source focal point for IED-related intelligence 

information originating within the national system, MNF, and HN sources. 

(c)  (U) Conducting trend analysis on adversary IED employment and device 

design to enhance friendly force protection programs and IED defeat operational planning. 

(d)  (U) Identifying and developing information (target packages) on the critical 

nodes in the adversary’s IED infrastructure to support C-IED operations. 

(2)  (U) 

Responsibilities.

  This cell is the primary agency responsible for fusion of 

technical assessments, forensic analyses, and all-source threat intelligence related to the IED 
threat within the theater of operations.  The cell will develop and disseminate threat TTP and 
advise the MNF in IED risk mitigation.  Working closely with the J-2 collection manager 
and the JIOC/JISE, the cell answers all relevant IED-related RFIs.  The cell is also 
responsible for developing actionable intelligence for the J-2’s portion of the CITP.  In 
developing its analytical products, the cell reviews all IED-related intelligence generated 
within the command and by the relevant entities (NGIC, TEDAC, COIC, etc.), fusing this 
information from a variety of sources including: 

 

 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Task Force (U) 

VI-7 

(a)  (U) CEXC. 

(b)  (U) WIT. 

(c)  (U) EOD teams. 

(d)  (U) J-2 terrain analysis team. 

(e)  (U) MSC input. 

(f)  (U) THTs. 

(g)  (U) JIEDDO field team after action reports. 

(3)  (U) 

TDC.

  The TDC is a consolidated effort of the NGIC and J-2’s intelligence 

assets.  The TDC cell, organic to the C-IED JTF intelligence cell, leverages all-source local 
and national IED intelligence exploits NGIC reachback capability to identify IED cell 
members and build targeting folders for execution by maneuver or special operations forces. 

(a)  (U) 

Manning.

  The TDC contains the following elements: 

1.  (U) Specialized target analytical team.  This team can concentrate on 

high priority concerns such as EFP manufacture. 

2.  (U) TECHINT. 

3.  (U) IED target analytical team. 

4.  (U) Database. 

(b)  (U) The majority of the cell’s personnel are dedicated to network targeting 

as directed by J-2 JIOC/JISE officer-in-charge.  Regional analysts are dedicated to each 
MSC to include a joint special operations task force.  These analysts have two basic 
missions: assist the supported intelligence sections in developing targeting packages and act 
as the C-IED intelligence cell’s local source for C-IED-related information that is passed 
directly to those targeting cells at the JTF. 

(4)  (U) 

Targeting.

  In a typical targeting scenario, JTF or locally (BCT/forward 

operating base level) developed information on a potential target will be compiled from all 
available local sources.  This information will be passed to the CITP at NGIC for further 
refinement using whatever information is available from national sources.  NGIC can also 
provide imagery of the target area.  NGIC will identify any gaps that exist in the available 
intelligence information.  These gaps will be monitored by the intelligence cell at the C-IED 
task force and, using command resources, the C-IED intelligence cell will attempt to fill 
those gaps.  The final package will then be passed to the appropriate echelon for action. 

(5)  (U) 

Products.

  The C-IED intelligence cell develops products designed to meet 

the specific needs of operational and tactical consumers.  These products are based on all-

Chapter VI 

VI-8 

JP 3-15.1 

source inputs and are designed to support the full range of information requirements for 
organizing the C-IED effort from training on the latest adversary TTP to developing 
targeting packages.   

(a)  (U) 

Analytical Support Products.

  Analysis of IED events detailing both 

blue and red actions. 

(b)  (U) 

Technical Analysis Products.

  Consist of detailed evaluation of the 

operating characteristics and potential vulnerabilities of IEDs (or their components) that have 
been recovered by field teams.   

(c)  (U) 

Quick Look Reports.

  Consist of quick turn reports with analysis on 

changes or emerging trends in adversary IED employment TTP. 

(d)  (U) 

Trend and Pattern Analysis.

  A detailed analysis of IED events in 

space and time to identify “hot spots” for C-IED targeting efforts and developments in the 
adversary’s employment of IEDs to support C-IED targeting and force protection initiatives. 

(e)  (U) 

Target Packages.

  Provide analysis identifying specific individuals 

and places associated with the adversary’s IED support infrastructure.  The packages provide 
operational planners with sufficient detail to plan and conduct operations focused on 
disrupting /capturing/neutralizing the identified IED infrastructure components. 

(f)  (U) 

Network Analysis.

  Diagrams of IED cells and networks for targeting. 

(g)  (U) 

Detainee Support Products.

  Status of detainees with linkage to IED 

networks. 

5.  (U) Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Task Force Staff Functions 

(U) The C-IED task force has two major responsibilities: directing the assigned EOD 

units and optimizing the JTF’s overall C-IED operation.  While it operates as a normal task 
force headquarters in planning for the employment and support of its assigned forces, the 
staff have some unique C-IED-related responsibilities including: 

a.  (U) 

C-IED Task Force J-3

 

(1)  (U) Assist in the development of the JTF’s C-IED plans and execute staff 

supervision over the operational aspects of them (subordinate unit involvement, rules of 
engagement, training, etc.). 

(2)  (U) Support the coordination of JTF-level C-IED operations and chair or attend 

designated C-IED organizations. 

(3)  (U) Coordinate with JTF’s designated engineer brigade on route clearance, 

sanitation, and improvement operations by providing forces and TECHINT. 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Task Force (U) 

VI-9 

(4)  (U) Supervise and facilitate the partnering operations with HN force’s bomb 

disposal companies and HN police IED defeat teams. 

b.  (U) C-IED Task Force Plans 

(1)  (U) In coordination with J-3, Develop and integrate C-IED enabler support into 

Future Plans, develop C-IED enabler subject matter expert (SME) input to plans and orders. 

(2)  (U) In coordination with J-3, develop and manage joint C-IED enabler force 

generation requirements for support to the MNF. 

c.  (U) C-IED Task Force J-7 (C-IED Training Team) 

(1)  (U)  Provide a C-IED program (relevant to the in-country threat) in order to 

provide  personnel  with the knowledge required to identify IEDs and IED indicators, 
application of CREW systems, cache search awareness, and the skills required to respond 
safely to threat situations. 

(2)  (U) Provide C-IED training teams to support in country RSOI as well as one 

mobile training team for deployment as required.  Coordinate with JIEDDO, JTF J-3 
training, and JTF J-7 to provide up-to-date training in C-IED TTP in theater and the 
CONUS.  In conjunction with JIEDDO develop and disseminate C-IED TTP to all forces. 

6.  (U) Counter-Improvised Explosive  Device Task Force Support to the Maneuver 
Units 

a.  (U) The planning and conduct of C-IED operations is a multi-echelon effort that must 

be closely coordinated and integrated.  The C-IED task force plays a critical role in this effort 
by attaching specialized C-IED support teams to the land component’s subordinate divisions, 
maneuver brigades, and battalions.  These C-IED support elements are designed to assist the 
maneuver unit in the planning, coordination,  and integration of its  immediate C-IED 
operations and act as a liaison to the C-IED task force.  The C-IED support element also 
coordinates the unit’s IED infrastructure targeting efforts.   

b.  (U) The division C-IED support element coordinates and integrates C-IED operations 

within the division operational area, and integrates C-IED enablers, analysis, and products 
into the division targeting process in order to support the division in maintaining freedom of 
action and defeating insurgent networks.  The division C-IED support element is comprised 
of a mix of specialized C-IED personnel such as CEXC, CITP, intelligence analysis, ORSA, 
and  LEP) along with intelligence and operations staff.  Critical  division C-IED support 
element tasks are detailed in Figure VI-2. 

 

 

Chapter VI 

VI-10 

JP 3-15.1 

DIVISION COUNTER-IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE  

SUPPORT ELEMENT CRITICAL TASKS (U) 

(U) 

Execution and 

synchronization of counter-
improvised explosive device 
(C-IED) operations. 

(U) 

Coordination and employment of forces in support of a C-IED 

plan.  This includes the analytical and intelligence assets that 
feed into the targeting and “attack the network”  processes.  
Provide the division commander with C-IED subject matter 
expertise (SME). 
 

(U) Provide C-IED operations 
planning support. 

(U)  Planning support to division headquarters with regards to 
integrating C-IED to operations.  Conduct internal planning to 
better provide SME to leadership and recommend C-IED 
priorities. 

(U) C-IED and explosive 
ordnance disposal (EOD) 
forces. 

(U)  Oversight and life support functions such as logistical, 
administrative, planning, and communications that enable C-IED 
forces to perform mission-essential tasks. 

(U) Conduct exploitation of 
improvised explosive device 
(IED) forensic and biometric 
material. 

(U) Personnel and develop future requirements.  Feed data into 
the incident database and report in accordance with the 
established forensic tracking process. 

(U) Identify and request 
emerging and immediate 
C-IED requirements. 

(U) Conduct assessments of C-IED capabilities and gaps based 
on threat and operational environment; document and 
communicate those gaps through appropriate channels for rapid 
resolution. 

(U) Support and provide in-
theater C-IED training and 
feed information to update 
predeployment training. 

(U)  Capture and analyze current tactics, techniques,  and 
procedures and best practices in order to develop in-theater 
training updates and refresher training.    Provide constant 
relevant feedback based on the threat, operational environment, 
and best practices that feeds into predeployment and IED 
awareness training. 

(U) Intelligence, analytical 
and network development 
support to C-IED operations. 

(U) Employment of required intelligence assets to determine IED 
threats and provide analysis on IED cells and sources that feed 
the targeting process. 

(U) Operations, intelligence, 
and analysis fusion. 

(U)  Conduct multidiscipline intelligence analysis to build an 
understanding of the enemy's operations and IED system. 
Intelligence analysts can gain access to multiple data feeds 
using C-IED operations integration center tools and taking 
advantage of US-based reachback support. 

(U) Operational research 
analysis. 

(U)  Compile analytically derived, empirically supported, 
quantitative assessments in support of decision making with 
regards to targeting and C-IED planning to enhance 
effectiveness of “attack the network”  efforts.    Provide impact 
assessments of operations and solutions on the IED networks. 

(U) Support to C-IED 
targeting. 

(U) Working within the joint task force’s targeting methodology, 
lead or participate in the joint targeting board to target IED cells 
and individuals.  Develop networks, nominate C-IED targets, and 
develop target packages. 

(U) Information sharing and 
archiving. 

(U) Ability to share pertinent intelligence across various networks 
to enable all friendly forces to make necessary linkages that will 
support both “attack the network” and “defeat the device” lines of 
operation.  Ensure  subordinate units collect all data on IED 
events that occur within their battle space. 

(U) Liaison with other 
organizations. 

(U) Ability to link with and include other organizations into the 
C-IED effort and ensure necessary information is shared. 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Task Force (U) 

VI-11 

(U) Multinational operation 
coordination and support. 

(U)  Ensuring that there is a unified and coordinated effort for 
C-IED across multinational forces. 

(U) Host nation partnering. 

(U) Enabling host nation training and information sharing in order 
to facilitate a transition of the C-IED effort. 

(U) Support C-IED 
information operations (IO). 

(U)  Understanding the human environment and supporting 
division IO campaign for IED awareness and  information to 
create a favorable impression or environment for multinational 
forces or the host nation among the local populace. 

Figure VI-2.  (U) Division Counter-Improvised Explosive Device  

Support Element Critical Tasks  

c.  (U) The brigade and battalion C-IED support element  plans, coordinates, and 

integrates C-IED operations within the units; and plans, coordinates and integrates C-IED 
enablers, analysis, and products into the unit’s targeting process to support the unit in 
maintaining  freedom of action and defeating insurgent networks.  Brigade and battalion 
C-IED support element tasks are listed in Figure VI-3 and VI-4. 

BRIGADE COUNTER-IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE 

SUPPORT ELEMENT CRITICAL TASKS (U)

 

(U) Execution and 
synchronization of counter-
improvised explosive device 
(C-IED) operations. 

(U) Coordination and employment of forces in support of a C-IED 
plan.  This includes the analytical and intelligence assets that 
feed into the targeting and “attack the network”  processes.  
Provide the brigade commander with C-IED subject matter 
expertise. 

(U) Provide C-IED operations 
planning support. 

(U)  Planning support to brigade headquarters with regards to 
integrating C-IED to operations.  Conduct internal planning to 
better provide subject matter expertise to leadership and 
recommend integrating C-IED priorities. 

(U) C-IED and explosive 
ordnance disposal force. 

(U)  Oversight and life support functions such as logistical, 
administrative, planning, and communications that enable 
integrating C-IED forces to perform mission-essential tasks. 

(U) 

Conduct exploitation of 

improvised explosive device 
(IED) forensic and biometric 
material. 

(U) 

Integrate 

IED 

exploitation into brigade operations, manage 

and coordinate personnel and exploitation assets to best support 
collection and the brigade commander’s intent.  Feed data into 
the joint operations area incident database and report in 
accordance with forensic tracking process. 

(U) 

Identify and request 

emerging and immediate 

C-IED 

requirements. 

(U) 

Conduct assessments of 

C-IED 

capabilities and gaps based 

on threat and operational environment; document and 
communicate those gaps through appropriate channels for rapid 
resolution. 

(U) 

Support and provide in-

theater 

C-IED 

training and 

feed information to update 
predeployment training. 

(U) 

Capture and analyze current tactics, techniques, and 

procedures and best practices in order to develop in-theater 
training updates and refresher training.  Provide constant 
relevant feedback based on the threat, operational environment, 
and best practices that feeds into predeployment and 

IED 

awareness training. 

(U) 

Intelligence, analytical, 

and network development 
support to 

C-IED 

operations. 

(U) 

Employment of required intelligence assets to determine 

IED 

threats and provide analysis on 

C-IED 

cells and sources that 

feed the targeting process. 

(U) 

Operations, intelligence, 

and analysis fusion. 

(U) 

Conduct  multidiscipline intelligence analysis to build an 

understanding of the enemy’s operations and 

IED 

network.  

Intelligence analysts can gain access to multiple data feeds 
using combined operations integration center’s tools and taking 
advantage of reachback support. 

Chapter VI 

VI-12 

JP 3-15.1 

(U) 

Operational research 

analysis. 

(U) 

Compile analytically derived, empirically supported, 

quantitative assessments in support of decision making with 
regards to targeting and 

C-IED 

planning to enhance 

effectiveness of “attack the network”  efforts.    Provide impact 
assessments of operations and solutions on the 

IED 

networks. 

(U) 

Information sharing and 

archiving. 

(U) 

Ability to share pertinent intelligence across various networks 

to enable all friendly forces to make necessary linkages that will 
support both “attack the network” and “defeat the device” lines of 
operation. 

(U) 

Liaison with other 

organizations. 

(U) 

Ability to link with and include other organizations into the 

C-IED 

effort and ensure necessary information is shared. 

(U) 

Host nation partnering. 

(U) 

Enabling host nation training and information sharing in order 

to facilitate a transition of the 

C-IED e

ffort. 

(U) 

Support 

C-IED 

information operations. 

(U) 

Understanding the human environment and supporting 

brigade information operations activities for 

IED 

awareness and 

information to create a favorable impression or environment for 
multinational or host nation forces among the local populace. 

Figure VI-3.  (U) Brigade Counter-Improvised Explosive Device  

Support Element Critical Tasks

 

BATTALION COUNTER-IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE  

SUPPORT ELEMENT CRITCIAL TASKS (U) 

(U) 

Advise battalion 

commander on counter-
improvised explosive device 
(

C-IED) 

matters. 

(U) 

Coordination and employment of forces in support of a 

C-IED 

plan.  This includes the analytical and intelligence assets that 
feed into the targeting and “attack the network”  processes.  
Provide the battalion commander with 

C-IED 

subject matter 

expertise. 

(U) 

Provide 

C-IED 

operations 

planning support. 

(U) 

Planning support to battalion headquarters with regards to 

integrating 

C-IED 

to operations.  Conduct internal planning to 

better provide subject matter expertise to leadership and 
recommend 

C-IED 

priorities. 

(U) 

Conduct and manage 

explosive ordnance 
disposal/improvised explosive 
device (

IED) 

disposal 

operations. 

(U) 

Coordinate and  conduct explosive ordnance disposal/

IED 

disposal operations in support of the battalion’s operations. 

(U) 

Conduct exploitation of 

C-IED 

forensic and biometric 

material. 

(U) 

Exploit, to the extent possible, all 

IED 

incidents within the 

battalion’s  operational area.  Coordinate proper tracking and 
evidence handling procedures of all collected material and ship 
to the appropriate lab for exploitation,  taking care that all 
explosive safety procedures are followed. 

(U) 

Identify and request 

emerging and immediate 

C-IED 

requirements. 

(U) 

Conduct assessments of 

C-IED 

capabilities and gaps based 

on threat and operational environment; document and 
communicate those gaps through appropriate channels for rapid 
resolution. 

(U) 

Intelligence, analytical 

and network development 
support to 

C-IED 

operations. 

(U) 

Employment of required intelligence assets to determine 

IED 

threats and provide analysis on 

IED 

cells and sources that feed 

the targeting process. 

(U) 

Operations, intelligence, 

and analysis fusion. 

(U) 

Conduct multidiscipline intelligence analysis to build an 

understanding of the enemy's operations and 

IED 

system.  

Intelligence analysts can gain access to multiple data feeds 
using combined operations integration center’s tools and taking 
advantage of reachback support. 

(U) 

Support to 

C-IED 

targeting. 

(U) 

Working within the joint task force headquarters’ targeting 

methodology,  participate in the targeting board to target 

IED 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Task Force (U) 

VI-13 

network cells and individuals.  Develop networks, nominate 

C-IED 

targets, and develop target packages. 

(U) 

Support 

C-IED 

information operations. 

(U) 

Understanding the human environment and supporting 

battalion’s information operations activities for 

IED 

awareness 

and information to create a favorable impression or environment 
for multinational or host nation forces among the local populace. 

(U) 

Deliver in-theater 

C-IED 

update/refresher training and 
provide information to update 
predeployment training. 

(U) 

Capture and analyze current tactics,  techniques, and 

procedures and best practices and feed that information to 
higher headquarters.  Deliver in-theater update/refresher training 
based on the battalion commander’s intent  

Figure VI-4.  (U) Battalion Counter-Improvised Explosive Device  

Support Element Critical Tasks 

 

7.  (U) Multinational Considerations 

a.  (U) 

 

In multinational operations, many of the participants do not have the trained and 

deployable EOD units, C-IED technologies, and exploitation capability required to protect 
their forces and take the fight to the enemy.  When participating in a multinational operation 
that is facing a significant IED threat, the US CJTF may be called upon to provide our 
partners with a variety of C-IED support.  At a minimum, this can include one or more of the 
following: 

(1)  (U) Providing EOD/WIT support to maneuver units. 

(2)  (U) Establishing a communications network for the rapid dissemination of IED-

related TTP for force protection. 

(3)  (U) Assistance in organizing and providing individual and unit IED awareness 

training.  

(4)  (U) Assistance in organizing and providing specialized training for deployed 

engineer sapper and EOD personnel. 

(5)  (U) In some instances, this training and technical assistance could extend to the 

loan of armored vehicles and CREW equipment. 

(6)  (U)

 

Upon DOD approval, sharing of C-IED network-related  intelligence 

information derived from various surveillance platforms and other intelligence sources. 

b.  (U)  A GCC, as a part of the theater campaign plan, can seek to facilitate the 

competency of HN PNs’ C-IED capabilities.  For a list of those tasks from phase 0 (Shape) 
to phase 5 (Enable Civil Authority), see Appendix E, “Counter-Improvised Explosive Device 
Annex Template.”   

8.  (U) Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Task Force Counter-Improvised 
Explosive Device Working Group 

(U) 

C-IED Task Force C-IED Working Group.

  When the CJTF establishes a C-IED 

task force, the responsibilities of the JTF J-3’s C-IED working group will normally transfer 
to the C-IED task force.  When the C-IED task force commander establishes the working 

Chapter VI 

VI-14 

JP 3-15.1 

group,  it will be responsible for identifying command-wide C-IED-related  issues and 
initiatives that impact the JTF’s C-IED effort.  The C-IED task force working group meets 
on a regular basis with representatives drawn from all the major organizations in the 
command.  It is chaired by the C-IED task force commander, who normally sets the group’s 
working agenda.  The working group shares information related to C-IED developments 
(updated information on adversary TTP modifications and friendly best practices) throughout 
the area of operations and works to resolve issues related to the JTF’s conduct of the C-IED 
efforts, including resource allocation issues, training, and information dissemination.  Issues 
that have a force-wide impact would be referred to the CJTF through the C-IED management 
board.   

a.  (U) 

Task  Force  C-IED Working  Group  Membership.

  The working group 

normally consists of representatives from the JTF’s staff and component commands, the 
C-IED task force staff and specialized cells (such as the TDC) and representatives of the 
specialized C-IED organizations supporting the JTF, such as JIEDDO field team, science 
advisor, IO cell, EWCC, Joint CREW Composite Squadron–One, Army Test and Evaluation 
Command, Rapid Equipping Force (REF), C-IED targeting cell, and the CEXC.  Special 
attention should be placed on including liaison officers on the task force C-IED working 
group .  Appropriate liaison officers can provide efficient and effective dissemination of 
emerging adversary TTP, friendly TTP, and best practices throughout the operational area.   

b.  (U) 

Task  Force  C-IED Working  Group  Products.

  In developing their 

recommendations for the overall conduct of the JTF’s C-IED efforts, the working group 
reviews the latest intelligence on the IED threat and relevant IED trend analysis; reviews and 
updates  the current C-IED TTP and emerging best practices; and examines  the current 
fielding and testing of the C-IED technologies.  The working group’s recommendations will 
normally be in the form of a change (or new guidance) for the JTF’s C-IED efforts, and/or 
the basic issue that will be referred to the JTF’s C-IED management board.  The C-IED 
working group process is described in Figure VI-5. 

 

 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Task Force (U) 

VI-15 

 
 

 

 

Figure VI-5.  (U) Counter-Improvised Explosive Device  

Working Group Process  

COUNTER-IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE

WORKING GROUP PROCESS




Analysis/determination of 

engagement area spots

Recommended priority intelligence 

requirements and/or named areas of 
interest

Electronic warfare plan/counter radio 

electronic warfare plan

Recommended route status

Route clearance plan/schedule

Recommended equipment fielding 

plan

Technical forensics trends

Counter-improvised explosive device 

operations request for support 
initiation




Lethal and nonlethal

Intelligence collection plan

Allocation of resources

Recommendation to act on 

intelligence (or not)

Actions/projects nested to operation 

plan to achieve objectives

Ultimate result: to neutralize, 

interdict or defeat an individual or 
network

Technical data 

and focus:

Trend and pattern 

analysis

Frequency 

management

Counter radio- 

controlled 
improvised 
explosive device 
electronic warfare

Technical 

forensics trends

Route clearance 

analysis

Equipment 

fielding

Counter-Improvised Explosive 

Device Working Group

Analysis and Recommendations 

for Commander

Joint Targeting 

Board

Input

Output

Feeds

Output

Chapter VI 

VI-16 

JP 3-15.1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Intentionally Blank 

A-1 

APPENDIX A 

COUNTER-IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE 

ENABLING ORGANIZATIONS (U) 

1.  (U) National Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Enabling Organizations 

a.  (U) IEDs will certainly be employed in future conflicts.  The proliferation of highly 

detailed bomb-making technologies on numerous sites over the Internet has greatly increased 
the probability that these asymmetric means will be exploited by our adversaries.  To counter 
IEDs and develop effective technological countermeasures to protect the joint force, the USG 
has organized a multiagency effort to actively assist DOD in the current C-IED effort and to 
address emerging threats.  This effort assists commanders, material developers, and the 
strategic community in their C-IED efforts and also provides direct support to attacking 
insurgent and terrorist networks by conducting “supply chain defeat” analysis.  While their 
overall efforts are complementary, each agency may pursue a different aspect of the IED 
challenge, but they should be synchronized and integrated.  These complementary efforts 
include: 

(1)  (U) Technical exploitation of the device to identify the potential technological 

means of neutralizing or defeating IEDs, i.e., employment of systems similar to CREW. 

(2)  (U) Forensic and biometric exploitation of the device in order to identify the 

bomb makers for future targeting. 

(3)  (U) Technical exploitation of the device and/or its target (post-blast analysis) to 

develop improved protection systems for personnel/vehicles and develop unit-level IED 
avoidance TTP and mitigate the IED’s effects. 

b.  (U) National-level  agencies conduct detailed analysis and provide the results to 

interested parties.  Much of this information supports in-theater C-IED efforts, providing 
timely, relevant, and predictive tactical IED intelligence on insurgent IED tactics and trends.  
National databases and technical IED intelligence also assist operational staffs at all 
command levels and specialized C-IED units in formulating C-IED TTP. 

c.  (U) To assist the national agencies in their C-IED efforts, a number of teams (WIT, 

EOD, JIEDDO, AWG) actively collect information associated with actual devices on-site.  
After preliminary in-theater technical analysis (CITP, CEXC), this information is forwarded 
to the national agencies for in-depth evaluation.  The principal entities involved in this effort 
include the multiagency TEDAC and NGIC. 

2.  (U) Federal Bureau of Investigation 

a.  (U) 

TEDAC.

  The TEDAC is within the FBI to coordinate and manage a unified 

national effort to gather, and technically and forensically exploit, terrorist IEDs worldwide.  
Together with the ATF and other partner agencies, it works to thoroughly analyze all IED-
related  information to form actionable intelligence that can be used to assist in terrorist 
investigations or develop strategies and technologies to counter  terrorist attacks.  The 

Appendix A 

A-2 

JP 3-15.1 

TEDAC compiles data and TECHINT  and has established direct links between terrorist 
explosive devices leading to the capture of insurgents.  It also functions as a repository and 
dissemination point for investigative, intelligence, bomb data, and safety information 
through the exploitation and cataloging of IEDs and the  analysis of  terrorist explosive 
incidents.  It is responsible for overseeing and facilitating the nation’s strategic-level WTI 
effort in support of strategic attack, targeting, and international policy development  by 
delivering analytical products to the warfighter through CEXC and NGIC based on priorities 
established by the GCC.  Other reports and information may be accessed by customers via 
the TEDAC’s Explosives Reference Tool Program database. 

b.  (U) 

Biometrics.

  In an effort to support the overseas contingency operations and 

information-sharing initiatives, the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division, in 
conjunction with DOD’s 

 

BIMA, works to share data collected by military troops deployed 

internationally.  The data consists of fingerprints, photographs, and biographical data of 
military detainees, enemy prisoners of war, or individuals of interest posing national security 
threats to the United States. 

(1)  

(U) Automated Biometric Identification System (ABIS).

  DOD’s ABIS 

consolidates, formats, and exchanges data equivalent and consistent to the FBI’s current 
state/county/local law enforcement model.  The ABIS database provides DOD with the 
ability to gather, store, share, and enter the information into the FBI’s Integrated Automated 
Fingerprint Identification System, which allows the FBI to disseminate the information to 
other government and law enforcement agencies. 

(2)  

(U) Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE).

  TIDE is the USG’s 

central repository of information (including biometric information) on international terrorist 
identities.  TIDE supports the USG’s various terrorist screening systems or “watch lists” and 
the US Intelligence Community’s overall counterterrorism mission.  The Terrorist Identities 
Group, located in National Counter-Terrorism Center’s Information Sharing and Knowledge 
Development Directorate, is responsible for building and maintaining TIDE.  The TIDE 
database includes, to the extent permitted by law, all information the USG possesses related 
to the identities of individuals known or appropriately suspected to be or have been involved 
in activities constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to terrorism, with the 
exception of purely domestic terrorism information. 

(U) “Examining tiny bits of bomb housings, wirings, detonation cords, fuses, 
switches, the chemical composition of the explosives and the electronic signatures 
of remote switching devices often used to detonate bombs, experts at the center 
have begun to compile a data bank about terror[ist]  bombs.  In some cases, 
forensic scientists have been able to obtain evidence of who made the bomb 
through a fingerprint or DNA [deoxyribonucleic acid] material left on an explosive 
part.” 

New York Times, 22 February 2004 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Enabling Organizations (U) 

A-3 

3.  (U) Defense Intelligence Agency—National Ground Intelligence Center 

a.  (U) 

DIA.

  The Director, DIA, in coordination with JIEDDO, directs, monitors, and 

modifies the WTI process, as necessary, to include activities pertaining to the collection, 
analysis, and primacy for exploitation of IED components,  either forensic or force 
protection.  The Directorate for Measurement and Signature Intelligence and Technical 
Collection’s Office of Forensic Intelligence plans, collects, processes, and exploits materiel 
of intelligence value to associate individuals, weapons and components, and locations and 
events in support of the DOD  and  intelligence community requirements.  DIA also 
coordinates more advanced exploitation of specific IEDs by a number of national technical 
laboratories. 

b.  (U) 

NGIC.

  The NGIC fuses EOD, WIT, CEXC, and other reports of IEDs and 

produces analytical products to support targeting of bomb makers and networks.  The NGIC 
maintains the CITP both in Virginia and forward locations to provide intelligence support to 
interrogation, targeting of bomb makers and insurgents, detainee management, biometrically 
enabled watch lists, and threat analysis.  The NGIC also produces biometric intelligence 
analysis  reports  (BIARs).  Additional WTI-related functions within NGIC focus on 
supporting the warfighter as well as providing solutions for force protection.  NGIC provides 
biometrically focused analysis, tools, training, watch  list management, and operational 
support to enable DOD and its interagency and multinational partners to deny anonymity to 
our nation’s adversaries. 

(1)  (FOUO) 

CITP.

  The CITP is designed to collect TECHINT  and conducts 

analysis of IED patterns, IED-related biometric matches, and IED/vehicle-borne improvised 
explosive device (VBIED) cell structures.  CITP is closely integrated with the NGIC’s 
biometrics effort to rapidly match individuals to specific IED incidents.  These actions are 
accomplished by matching and assessing latent prints, fibers, and other data.  CITP also 
supports targeting efforts by conducting personality-based network analysis and device-
based network analysis.  CITP analysts stationed at forward locations work with targeting 
cells, attend targeting meetings, and support efforts to identify IED networks by providing 
relevant information and analysis to targeting packages. 

(2)  (U) 

Anti-Armor Analysis Program.

  The Anti-Armor Analysis Program, also 

located at the NGIC, investigates and analyzes the outcome of insurgent attacks on armored 
vehicles worldwide.  Analysis is provided to operational commanders down to battalion 
level, materiel and research and development program managers, and DOD leaders.  The 
Anti-Armor Analysis Program uses WTI-derived intelligence  to identify trends in the 
adversary’s development, manufacture, and procurement of anti-armor weapons.  The Anti-
Armor Analysis Program makes TTP and interdiction recommendations to battlefield 
commanders and the Army staff to mitigate the effectiveness of the adversary’s weapon 
systems. 

(3)  (U) 

NGIC IED/Mines Branch.

  The IED branch determines how an IED or an 

IED component impacts the current and future joint force operations.  The IED branch 
analyzes the technology to understand how it functions, effectiveness of the device, 
frequency of use, emplacement TTP involving the device placement, how it may be used as 

Appendix A 

A-4 

JP 3-15.1 

an advantage over current counter-technology, and how it may evolve in the future.  This 
analysis  is provided directly to the warfighter  and  the C-IED developers and related 
organizations. 

4.  (U) Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization 

a.  (U) JIEDDO focuses all DOD actions in support of combatant commanders and 

CJTF efforts to defeat IEDs as weapons of strategic influence.  JIEDDO develops force 
protection requirements and streamlines science and technology (S&T),  along with 
prioritizing research, development, and acquisition.  JIEDDO also determines the priority for 
exploitation of materiel at TEDAC and works with other PNs to assist in the exploitation of 
IEDs. 

b.  (U) 

COIC.

  JIEDDO provides direct support to the deployed warfighter through the 

COIC.  The COIC’s mission: “In support of all geographic combatant commands, the COIC 
harnesses, masses, and fuses information, analysis, technology, interagency collaboration, 
and training support to enable more precise attacks to defeat networks which employ IEDs.  
Be prepared to provide analytical support and enemy network information to other USG 
organizations and multinational partners.”  The COIC focuses on integrating and analyzing 
information from multiple intelligence databases and fusing it into products that answer a 
strategic, operational, and tactical commander’s request for support (RFS).  Within the latest 
time of value model, JIEDDO COIC answers RFS directly from joint and Service members 
in order to alleviate hours of organizational intelligence staff work.  The COIC maintains a 
federated architecture ,which leverages the expertise from the intelligence community as 
well as national laboratories and academia.  Products forwarded from JIEDDO COIC 
include, but are not limited to, comprehensive persistent views of networks employing IEDs; 
pattern analysis; geospatial analysis; network dynamics analysis; social network analysis; 
complex adaptive systems analysis; products that support JIPOE and targeting packages, all 
focused on defining and enabling the commander to have more lethal and nonlethal desired 
effects on networks that employ IEDs. 

c.  (U) 

 

Joint Training Counter-Improvised Explosive Device  Operations 

Integration Center (JTCOIC). 

  The JTCOIC trains units on COIC tradecraft 

methodologies prior to their deployment.  The JTCOIC replicates JIEDDO COIC’s 
reachback capability and processes, computer-based applications, and AtN methodologies.  
Training occurs primarily at home station, combat training centers, and mission readiness 
exercises (MRXs).  The JTCOIC develops tactical scenarios to replicate real-world threats 
within the deploying units’ operational area to create training realism and enhance 
understanding of reachback capabilities that JIEDDO COIC can provide upon deployment.  
JTCOIC analysts tie into JIEDDO COIC’s software applications to obtain actual theater-
specific intelligence data.  They subsequently sanitize this data and prepare training products 
for units going through MRXs. 

d.  (U) 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization Knowledge and 

Information Fusion Exchange (JKnIFE).

  JKnIFE acts as the DOD central repository for 

IED-related information.  Its primary purpose is to exchange information, consolidate best 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Enabling Organizations (U) 

A-5 

practices, and respond to RFIs related to the asymmetric application of IED-related TTP by 
both enemy and friendly forces. 

5.  

(U)

  Department of Defense, Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office, 

Technical Support Working Group  

(U) The technical support working group is part of the national interagency research and 

development program for combating terrorism requirements.  Its C-IED mission is to 
identify, prioritize, and execute research and development projects that satisfy interagency 
requirements to more safely and effectively render terrorist devices safe.  Particular emphasis 
is placed on technologies to access, diagnosis, and defeat terrorist IEDs, improvised CBRN 
devices, and VBIEDs. 

6.  (U) Service Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Enabling Organizations 

a.  (U) 

The Naval Explosive 

Ordnance 

Disposal  Technology Division 

(NAVEODTECHDIV) develops and delivers EOD knowledge, tools, equipment, and life 
cycle support through an expeditionary workforce that exploits technology and information, 
contributes to the TECHINT process, and provides expertise which meets the needs of the 
DOD  EOD community, combatant commanders,  and interagency partners. 
NAVEODTECHDIV as the program of record organization for CEXC is also responsible to 
man, train, and equip the Technical Support Detachment’s CEXC platoons in both Level I 
and Level II exploitation.  NAVEODTECHDIV also manages the Joint Digital Information 
Gathering System (JDIGS), which is the standardized EOD reporting system for the joint 
EOD community.  Data captured by JDIGS is networked to the Combined Information Data 
Network Exchange (CIDNE) reporting system and is used to produce WTI-related reports 
for analysis. 

b.  (U) 

US Army Research, Engineering and Development Command—Intelligence 

and Information Warfare Division  (I2WD).

  I2WD performs exploitation and 

characterization of IED components in support of Electronic Warfare Reprogramming, as 
well as SIGINT systems and countermeasures development.  I2WD’s intelligence staff also 
tracks IED and asymmetric technologies worldwide, monitors and analyzes current IED 
events to document enemy TTP that may be relevant to detect and counter threat systems, 
and identifies infrastructure requirements for US test sites. 

c.  (FOUO) 

US Army Criminal Investigations Command, Forensic Exploitation 

Battalion—Joint Expeditionary Forensic Facility (JEFF).

  Assigned to the Army’s

 

Forensic Exploitation Battalion,

 

the JEFF is a modular and scalable deployable forensic 

laboratory designed to support targeting, sourcing, prosecution,  and detainment and 
interrogation operations.  JEFFs serve as stand-alone facilities for the forensic exploitation of 
non-IED-related materiel, although they can also provide C-IED-related analysis if needed.  
JEFF capabilities include fingerprint processing, firearm (including fired bullets and 
cartridge cases) and tool-mark analysis, and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis.  JEFF 
laboratories provide direct support to CEXC by analyzing the tool marks on EFP liners to 
determine fabrication processes and link EFP liners discovered in caches to caches in 
adjacent areas.

 

Appendix A 

A-6 

JP 3-15.1 

d.  (U) 

20th Support Command (CBRNE)

  provides  C2  of full-spectrum CBRNE 

forces and is capable of deploying as JTF weapons of mass destruction-elimination (WMD-
E) in support of joint and Army force commanders.  It provides C2 to all CONUS-based 
EOD formations.  The 20th Support Command also exercises training and readiness 
oversight of the Army National Guard EOD Group (111th EOD Group).  The command’s 
Joint Technical Analysis and Integration Cell (JTAIC) provides CBRNE  TECHINT 
assessments and planning expertise in support of WMD-E to enable worldwide C-IED and 
WMD-E operations.  JTAIC products include:  providing analysis and fusion of WTI and 
CBRNE intelligence; providing support to targeting and RFI management; advising the J-3 
on the composition and skill sets required for site exploitation teams; prioritizing the WMD 
master site list and producing finished TECHINT  reports to support force protection, 
targeting, sourcing and support to prosecution. 

e.  (U) 

REF.

  The REF is an organization that takes its operational guidance from the 

Department of the Army assistant chiefs of staff, operations/plans/information engagement 
(G-3/5/7), and reports directly to the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army.  It has a broad task to 
rapidly increase mission capability while reducing the risk to Soldiers, Marines, and others.  
The REF accomplishes this mission by providing the following services: 

(1)  (U) Equips operational commanders with off-the-shelf (government or 

commercial) solutions or near-term developmental items that can be developed, tested, and 
acquired quickly. 

(2)  (U) Introduces future force technology solutions that support deploying forces’ 

requirements.  Actions are accomplished by developing, testing, and evaluating key 
technologies and systems under specific operational conditions per requiring units CONOPS. 

(3)  (U) Assesses the capabilities and advises Army and other stakeholders of the 

findings that will enable forces to rapidly confront an adaptive enemy. 

f.  (U) 

US Army

 

AWG.

  The AWG is a sensitive  activity under the headquarters, 

Department of the Army G-3/5/7, that provides operational advisory assistance in support of 
Army and JFCs.  The AWG was created by the Army to enhance the combat effectiveness of 
the operating force and enable the defeat of asymmetric threats to include IEDs.  The AWG 
deploys its forces worldwide to observe, assess,  and analyze information regarding the 
evolving operating environment and the threat.  They also assist in the development, 
dissemination,  and integration of material and nonmaterial solutions including 
countermeasures.  The AWG serves as an agent of change providing key observations and 
perspectives for leaders when considering policy and resource decisions.  The following 
capabilities summarize the units’ contributions to joint force C-IED efforts: 

(1)  (U) Identifies and develops solutions for capability gaps that: 

(a)  (U) Exploit adversary vulnerabilities, and 

(b)  (U) Mitigate friendly vulnerabilities. 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Enabling Organizations (U) 

A-7 

(2)  (U) Provides a global presence and insight regarding emerging asymmetric 

threats. 

(3)  (U) Enhances existing Service capabilities: 

(a)  (U) Rapid Title 10, US Code (doctrine, organization, training, materiel, 

leadership and education, personnel, and facilities [DOTMLPF]) solution development 
through first-hand observations and internal combat/materiel development capabilities. 

(b)  (U) Operates in support of all types of forces—generating/operating 

(special operations and conventional forces). 

(4)  (U) Conducts simultaneous collaboration with geographic combatant 

commands/Army Service component commands and through the Army’s REF for solution 
development, dissemination, and integration. 

g.  (U) 

US Army Engineer School Counter Explosive Hazards Center (CEHC)

.  The 

CEHC is the Army integrator for all countermeasures involving explosive hazards and serves 
as a center of excellence to ensure that the US Army maintains superiority in all facets of 
countermine and counter-explosive warfare.  During contingency operations, these 
countermeasures may include new operational concepts  and  application of nonstandard 
materiel or off-the shelf technology into unique conditions.  Countermeasures may also 
include development and training of theater-specific TTP against explosive threats consisting 
of landmines, unexploded ordnance (UXO), and IEDs.  The CEHC remains in continuous 
contact with the field to identify equipment and training needs or capability gaps in order to 
immediately provide combat engineers with better mission capabilities.  When a requirement 
is identified, the CEHC coordinates with program managers, combat developers, government 
laboratories, the REF, JIEDDO, and others to  evaluate suitable material systems and 
candidates for potential integration and rapid fielding.  Once a device or item is selected, the 
CEHC assists in the system’s integration, development of its operational concept, training 
support package, and operational assessment.  To ensure countermeasures are up-to-date and 
relevant, the CEHC gathers the latest intelligence on explosive hazards and adversary TTP as 
well as TTP employed by friendly units to counter the threat.  A key task for the CEHC is 
training and updating the force in current counter explosive hazards techniques and 
employment of commercial off-the-shelf  and contingency equipment.  This instruction 
enables units to receive theater-specific training prior to deployment and allows them to 
focus on  the mission during transition of authority.  Contingency training that will be 
permanently retained in the Army will eventually be institutionalized and transferred to the 
official school training curriculum, such as operator training for route clearance vehicles. 

h.  (U) 

United States Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory (MCWL).

  MCWL is 

the lead USMC agency for IED defeat.  MCWL leads a USMC IED working group made up 
of representatives from the USMC, national-level intelligence agencies, and operating forces.  
The USMC IED working group rapidly identifies, evaluates, and facilitates the fielding of 
material and nonmaterial IED defeat solutions to the operating forces.  It works in close 
coordination with the JIEDDO integrated product team to synchronize DOD IED defeat 
efforts. 

Appendix A 

A-8 

JP 3-15.1 

i.  (U) 

Other Marine Corps Organizations  That Support C-IED Efforts.

  The 

following Marine Corps organizations provide primary support to the development and 
implementation of C-IED capabilities within the Marine Corps: 

(1)  (U) Deputy Commandant, Combat Development and Integration, is the Service 

advocate for C-IED matters and integrates C-IED operational issues across the DOTMLPF 
spectrum. 

(2)  (U) Marine Corps Center for Lessons Learned collects and archives reports of 

C-IED training and operations.  It provides classified and unclassified archives that can be 
used to identify DOTMLPF trends, materiel requirements, and MAGTF  C-IED best 
practices. 

(3)  (U)  Marine Corps Systems Command performs acquisition and life cycle 

maintenance of materiel solutions in support of MAGTF C-IED operations.  The command’s 
material acquisitions may be in response to an urgent universal need statement or to more 
deliberate acquisition requirements. 

(4)  (U)  Training and Education Command is responsible for development, 

standardization, and execution of Marine Corps training at the individual, unit, and force 
level.  It is also responsible for coordinating cross-Service C-IED training. 

(5)  (U) Marine Corps Tactics and Operations Group (MCTOG) conducts training 

for the battalion and regimental combat team (RCT) ground combat element headquarters.  
As the Marine Corps experts on AtN training within the MAGTF C-IED operational 
environment, MCTOG trains regimental, battalion, and company battle staffs using the 
Spartan Resolve training exercise. 

(6)  (U)  Marine Corps Engineer School  conducts unit and individual C-IED 

operations (AtN, defeat the device, route reconnaissance, and clearance) training. 

(7)  (U) Marine Corps Intelligence Activity provides intelligence analysis to support 

C-IED training and operations.  

 

7.  (U) Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Enablers within the Joint Task Force 

(U)  A number of specialized organizations have been created to assist with the 

identification of and defeat of individual IEDs and the supporting infrastructure.  These 
enablers are normally found supporting the joint force and its maneuver units and include: 

a.  (U) 

Site exploitation teams

 are specifically detailed and trained teams at the tactical 

level.  The teams conduct search operations identifying, documenting, and preserving the 
cache site and its material.  The team also collects material of intelligence evidence value for 
further analysis and exploitation, including pattern analysis, trend identification, and rule of 
law. 

b.  (U) The 

DOMEX center 

is responsible for the rapid and accurate extraction, 

exploitation, and analysis of captured enemy documents, media, and material.  The NGIC 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Enabling Organizations (U) 

A-9 

manages the Army’s DOMEX program.  DOMEX exploitation and analysis teams are 
deployed to the brigade level and work with maneuver units. 

c.  (FOUO) The Navy CEXC  conducts investigations of significant events; exploits 

IEDs and recovering frequencies from RCIEDs to update EW equipment; tests explosive 
residue; recovers and evaluates forensic and biometric material; identifies IED trends and 
bomb maker signatures; creates profiles to better enable offensive operations; and conducts 
limited component tracking.  CEXC has direct linkages to NAVEODTECHDIV  (as the 
program of record organization for CEXC), NGIC, COIC, DIA, and TEDAC to support AtN, 
“defeat the device,” and “train the force” LOOs. 

d.  (U) 

EOD

 units are the forces employed to render safe and exploit IEDs as well as 

dispose of UXO and exploit and reduce enemy weapons stores and caches in either a land 
based or maritime environment.  The Army and Navy group headquarters provide command, 
control, and staff planning for two to six ordnance battalions.  It provides technical direction 
for the EOD mission operations of subordinate units.  The group also disseminates 
TECHINT information throughout the command and to other selected organizations.  The 
group commander acts as the senior EOD land warfare officer for the theater army 
command.  Army and Navy EOD groups are utilized as the core C2 element for C-IED task 
forces, with C2 over assigned Army, Navy, and Air Force EOD units and specialized C-IED 
enablers.  These formations can be utilized to provide C2 for a two- to three-star-level JTF or 
joint EOD task force.  When a C-IED task force is established, it will direct the employment 
of Army (and other attached) EOD assets in support of the maneuver force.  (Note: The 
USMC’s EOD assets are not normally assigned to a C-IED task force, when established, but 
do receive a WIT to coordinate with radio battalions, and download cell phone and computer 
information for local exploitation.  USMC EOD units are organic to the MAGTF  and 
provide direct support to Marine infantry battalions.  As the Marines retain their assets, the 
joint force provides enablers in the form of C-IED teams for the headquarters, WIT,  to 
accompany Marine EOD elements, and intelligence support of all types [as requested].) 

(U)

  For additional information on Service EOD capabilities, see Field Manual (FM) 

4-30.16/Marine Corps Reference Publication 3-17.2C/Navy Tactics, Techniques, and 
Procedures 3-02.5/ Air Force Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (Instruction) 3-2.32, 

Multi-Service Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Explosive Ordnance Disposal in a 
Joint Environment.

 

e.  (

U) 

EHCC.

  Part of the JFC’s land component engineer staff, the EHCC assists in the 

development of the COP and provides informational and situational understanding on 
explosive hazards to all MNFs, the National Mine Action Authority, and nongovernmental 
organizations.  EHCC enables the land component commander to predict, track, distribute 
information on, and mitigate explosive hazards within the theater that affect force 
application, focused logistics, protection, and operational environment awareness.  The 
EHCC supports C-IED efforts throughout the theater and JOA with technical advice and 
TTP training.  The EHCC has oversight responsibility for geospatial and topographic 
products and manages acquisition and distribution of specialized route clearance equipment.  
The EHCC: 

Appendix A 

A-10 

JP 3-15.1 

(1)  (U) Provides counter-IED and explosive hazard awareness training to the force. 

(2)  (U) Provides technical and tactical training using mobile training teams. 

(3)  (U) Manages acquisition and distribution of specialized route clearance 

equipment. 

(4)  (U) Establishes, maintains, and shares the EHDB within the JOA. 

(5)  (U) Assists intelligence analysts and ISR planners with explosive hazards 

pattern analysis and intelligence collection management. 

(6)  (U) Supports efforts with J-7 engineers in sourcing engineer units (mine 

detection equipment, specialized search dogs, and new technologies).

 

f.  (U) 

Service Engineer Units.

  Service engineer units perform specific combat 

engineer missions relating to explosive hazards, including breaching, clearing, and proofing 
minefields.  In extreme high-operational tempo or combat missions, US Army engineers or 
other non-EOD units may conduct limited reduction or clearing of nonmine explosive and 
IED hazards, under the technical guidance of Army EOD forces.  US Army engineer units 
involved in addressing IED explosive hazards include: 

(1)  (U) 

US Army Clearance Company.

  A clearance company conducts detection 

and limited IED reduction along routes and within areas of support to enable force 
application, focused logistics, and protection.  It provides training readiness and oversight of 
assigned route and area clearance platoons.  The company provides battle command for three 
to five route, area, or sapper platoons.  It is capable of clearing a total of 255 kilometers of 
two-way routes per day (three routes of 85 kilometers each) and can clear a total of two acres 
per day (two areas at one acre each), depending on the enemy situation, terrain, and weather 
conditions.  The company’s route clearance platoons and teams are assigned the mission of 
clearing routes that have had a high incidence of IED activity. 

(2)  (U) 

Engineer Mine Dog Detachment.

  Engineer mine detection dogs are 

trained for the military operating environment to perform area and route clearance and 
search, minefield extraction, combat patrols, building search (disruptive and nondisruptive), 
vehicle search, and cave clearance.  The dogs can reduce the time spent on a search and can 
detect metallic and nonmetallic mines, both buried and surface laid. 

(3)  (U) 

Explosive ordnance clearance agent (EOCA)

 personnel are Army combat 

engineers trained to perform limited battlefield disposal of UXO as outlined in the EOCA 
identification guide and supplemental list of EOCA ordnance provided by the theater EOD 
commander (part of the ordnance order of battle) during route reconnaissance or route 
clearance operations or other engineer missions.  EOCA personnel are authorized to blow in 
place single munitions-based IEDs that are positively identifiable in the EOCA identification 
guide.  They are NOT trained to move, combine, and/or destroy multiple UXO (such as a 
cache or IED incorporating more than one munition) or to perform reconnaissance or 
handling of IED or VBIED incidents. 

 

Counter-Improvised Explosive Device Enabling Organizations (U) 

A-11 

(4)  (U) 

Terrain teams

 are deployed at the brigade, division, and corps levels to 

provide terrain analysis and geospatial support to the field.  IED defeat-related support 
includes route analysis, identification of choke points, assembly areas, line-of-sight analysis, 
and other tactical decision aids.  Terrain teams can also perform geospatial pattern analysis 
for tracking and locating IEDs. 

(5)  (U) 

EHT.

  Assigned to the J-7 EHCC, the mission of an EHT is to provide 

evaluation of explosive hazard incident sites in support of brigade-size and smaller units and 
other similar-size joint, interagency, and multinational forces and organizations.  The EOD 
company and EHT coordinate and synchronize explosive hazard information and capability 
throughout the COP and AOR.  The EHT’s capabilities include: 

(a)  (U) Conducting site evaluation of explosive hazard incident sites, and 

(b)  (U) Conducting TTP training (explosive hazards awareness training, 

AN/PSS-14, and area clearance) for BCT and RCT and joint, interagency, and multinational 
personnel on explosive hazard mitigation in a JOA. 

g.  (U) 

Electronic Warfare Officer (EWO).

  The EWO is the commander’s subject 

matter expert on CREW.  The EWO coordinates spectrum management with the division and 
brigade’s communications officer to deconflict electronic attack, manages and oversees the 
employment of CREW systems, conducts EW training, and monitors exploitation results for 
changes in the enemy’s use of the spectrum to ensure that load sets are valid. 

h. (U) 

Marine Corps engineer units

 possess personnel that

 

are trained to identify and 

destroy (blow in place) certain explosive obstacles based upon mission requirements and the 
supported commander's approval/authorization. 

 

8.  (

U)

 Weapons Intelligence Teams 

a.  (U) WITs consists of four- to five-person elements (Figure A-1).  WITs gather data to 

exploit IED-related intelligence, recreate the scene of attacks to understand adversary TTP, 
and contribute input to unit after-action reviews and friendly force TTP development.  The 
WIT provides IED intelligence collection capability to support BCT, RCT, and corps 
intelligence analysis of IEDs and the adversary’s IED operations.  WIT-derived intelligence 
also forms the basis for potential targeting of bomb makers and bomb-making networks 
within the AOR.  WIT capabilities include the ability to provide IED reports directly into the 
theater and national intelligence fusion cells via CIDNE; the ability to conduct 
complementary IED investigations with EOD, to include assisting in TECHINT collection, 
cataloging, reporting and evacuation of IED to theater (e.g., CEXC) and national lab (e.g., 
TEDAC) for exploitation; and the provision of weapons intelligence training for the soldiers 
in the maneuver units. 

b.  (U) There are a variety of ways to configure and assign WITs.  Organic to the C-IED 

task force’s weapons intelligence flight, individual WITs are normally found at the brigade 
level responding to IED events.  They can be assigned in direct support to the EOD 
companies that are in direct support to the maneuver BCTs or as part of a brigade C-IED 
team (consisting of a C-IED training element, a WIT element, a CITP element, and a CREW 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Content      ..     31      32      33      34     ..