|
|
Title: Fire Protection Procedure
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-159-C1
Rev No: C1
Page 10 of 15
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
3. Follow the fire and emergency procedures specific to the site / installation.
4.3 PERSONNEL RESPONSE TO FIRE ALARM
Note: The procedures to be adopted upon discovering a fire, or hearing the fire
alarm, are site specific and will vary between locations. For example, on an
offshore installation, some personnel might not evacuate immediately but
are required to remain at their place of work in order to make plant and
equipment safe or to form part of the fire fighting team. For this reason the
information given here is of a generic nature only.
Upon hearing the fire alarm, personnel should:
1. Switch off / make safe the equipment they are using and leave the area /
building by the nearest safe exit, closing doors and windows behind them
2. Proceed in accordance with local fire and emergency procedures.
Note: Personnel should not delay from evacuating to collect their personal belongings.
5 FIRE PROTECTION
5.1 FIXED FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT
5.1.1 Description and Types
The most common types of fixed fire fighting systems are:
Sprinklers
High Velocity Water Spray (Automatic and Manual)
Medium Velocity Water Spray (Automatic and Manual)
High Expansion Foam Flooding Systems (Fixed and Portable)
CO2 Fire Suppression Systems (may be used in unmanned areas).
5.1.2 Location and Operation
As a minimum, fixed fire fighting systems shall be located and used in accordance
with the manufacturer’s recommendations and in accordance with local legislation.
Fixed fire fighting systems shall not be modified in any way without undergoing a
thorough Risk Assessment. Any modification must only be carried out in accordance
with UNIF-HSE-PRO-312 Management of Change.
All modifications shall be recorded and held on site.
5.1.3 Inspection and Maintenance
As a minimum, fixed fire fighting systems should be inspected and maintained by a
competent person and in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and
recommendations and local legislation. The Site Manager / Offshore Installation
Manager shall ensure that a suitable inspection and maintenance programme is in
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Fire Protection Procedure
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-159-C1
Rev No: C1
Page 11 of 15
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
place for fixed fire fighting systems.
Inspection results and any repairs carried out to a fixed fire fighting system must be
recorded and held on site for future reference.
5.2 PORTABLE FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT
5.2.1
Description and Types
Water: Water filled extinguishes are suitable for use on fires involving paper,
wood, and rubbish.
Warning: Water extinguishers must not be used on electrical fires where
there is a possibility of the water coming into contact with
electrical sources.
Foam: Foam filed fire extinguishers may be used successfully on fires
involving paper, wood and general rubbish. However, foam fire extinguishers
are primarily designed for use on oil fires.
Warning: Foam extinguishers must not be used on electrical fires where
there is a possibility of the foam coming into contact with electrical
sources.
Dry Powder: Dry powder filled extinguishers may be used on fires involving
rubbish and oil and may also be used on electrical fires. However, the use of
dry powder on electrical equipment usually makes that equipment unusable.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2): CO2 extinguishers are intended for use on electrical
fires only. If used on fires involving rubbish and debris, the pressure from the
extinguisher is likely to disturb the seat of the fire and spread burning material.
For the same reason they are not suitable for oil based fires.
5.2.2
Location
Portable fire fighting equipment must be placed in accordance with local fire
regulations, national fire protection guidelines and any other requirements.
The location of all portable fire fighting equipment should be shown on safety plans
placed at strategic locations around the site / installation.
5.2.3 Operation and Use - Recharging
All extinguishers must be recharged immediately after each use. Chemicals must
never be mixed, as the resulting chemical reactions may damage the extinguisher.
Recharging must only be done by trained personnel.
5.2.4 Inspection and Maintenance
All maintenance of portable fire fighting equipment must be carried out by a
competent person and in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations and
local legislation.
The following inspections represent the minimum requirements of any inspection
programme:
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Fire Protection Procedure
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-159-C1
Rev No: C1
Page 12 of 15
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
All extinguisher units must be in the designated location and clearly visible.
Signs or painted red backgrounds may be used to identify extinguisher
locations.
All extinguishers must be visually checked every month to ensure operational
reliability (for example, seals are in place, nozzles and hoses are free from
damage and the units can be accessed easily).
Annual inspections must be performed as per manufacturer’s specifications
and applicable regulations.
Inspection results shall be documented for each extinguisher unit and
retained on file at the local site.
6 TRAINING AND DRILLS
6.1 TRAINING PROGRAMME
All personnel are required to be knowledgeable on the common causes and types of
fire and must be familiar with the use of fire fighting equipment. This is achieved by
the use of a comprehensive training programme that includes:
established training courses for all personnel joining a BP installation,
including a schedule of planned and regular refresher courses
regular on-site drills and practices.
6.2 TRAINING RECORDS
Training records for all personnel shall be held on site. In particular, for offshore
installations, all personnel shall have completed their training before being allowed
offshore unless the Offshore Installation Manager grants dispensation (for example,
for contractor personnel who shall only be offshore on a one-off basis and only for a
limited period).
6.3 PRACTICE DRILLS
Practice drills shall be held at regular intervals according to an established
programme. The drills shall be used to practice and improve personnel skills and
knowledge in fire fighting techniques and also to highlight any shortcomings in
established fire fighting procedures.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Fire Protection Procedure
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-159-C1
Rev No: C1
Page 13 of 15
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Fire Protection Procedure
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-159-C1
Rev No: C1
Page 14 of 15
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS
Fire Protection:
All measures used to minimise injury and loss through fire,
including procedures, design, selection, installation and
maintenance.
Fire Prevention:
Procedures used to minimise or prevent fire.
Fire Detection
Equipment designed to detect fire and raise the alarm.
Systems:
Fire
Systems designed to suppress or extinguish fires through
Suppression
automatic or manual activation.
Systems:
Emergency
Planned measures designed to minimise the risk of injury in an
Procedures:
emergency situation.
Combustible:
The property of any material or substance that will readily burn.
Flammable:
The property of a substance that ignites easily, burns intensely
and has a rapid flame-spread.
Flash Point:
The lowest temperature at which a flammable or combustible
liquid gives off vapours to form an ignitable mixture with air.
Ignition
The lowest temperature at which a mixture of vapour and air will
Temperature:
ignite without a spark or flame. The term also applies to the
temperature of a hot surface that can ignite flammable vapours.
Flammable or
The range between the smallest and largest amounts of vapour
Explosive
in a given quantity of air that will explode or burn. The amount is
Range:
usually given in percentages and are based on normal
atmospheric temperatures and pressures.
Water
The capability of a flammable or combustible liquid to be soluble
Solubility:
in water.
Spontaneous
Ignition due to the rapid oxidation of a substance that generates
Combustion:
enough heat for ignition to occur.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Fire Protection Procedure
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-159-C1
Rev No: C1
Page 15 of 15
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
APPENDIX B - CHECKLIST FOR FIRE SAFETY MANAGEMENT
Note: This checklist in this appendix is provided as an aide memoir only, and is not
intended for use as an approved test certificate or an official document:
CHECKLIST FOR FIRE SAFETY MANAGEMENT
Ensure that written fire safety and emergency evacuation instructions are
provided, properly displayed and regularly updated.
Ensure that all means of escape from buildings, installations and work areas
are properly indicated and readily accessible.
Ensure that adequate fire fighting equipment is provided, correctly located
and indicated.
Make all personnel aware of the location of escape routes, fire alarms and fire
fighting equipment.
Arrange training in the use of fire fighting equipment.
Keep readily combustible materials and flammable liquids to a minimum
consistent with reasonable requirements and ensure that relevant statutory
requirements, codes and client standards are observed, particularly during
cutting and welding operations.
Ensure that good housekeeping is practised, for example, the removal of
unwanted rubbish and packing materials from the work area.
Ensure that an annual fire safety audit of all premises is carried out.
Refer to the HSE Adviser in the event of queries.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
AZERBAIJAN BUSINESS UNIT
(AzBU)
Procedure for:
Gas Detection Equipment
C1
05.10.04
G.Stacey
G.Hunt
G.Laird
G.Campbell
Rev
Date
Reason for
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by TA
Endorsed by
Issue
Notes: Renumbered,
HSE - SAFETY
Reformatted and Front sheet
added.
Azerbaijan BU Document Reference
Asset Code
Dept Code
Document Type
Sequence No
Revision Code
UNIF
HSE
PRO
201
C1
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Gas Detection Equipment
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-201-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 2 of 10
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
INTRODUCTION
3
1.1
DOCUMENT PURPOSE
3
1.2
DOCUMENT SCOPE
3
2
RESPONSIBILITIES
3
2.1
SITE MANAGER
3
2.2
AREA AUTHORITY
3
2.3
GAS TESTERS
3
3
GAS DETECTORS (TYPE AND USE)
4
3.1
ALL GAS DETECTORS
4
3.2
FIXED GAS DETECTORS
4
3.3
PORTABLE GAS DETECTORS
4
4
FIXED GAS DETECTION SYSTEMS
4
4.1
LOCATION AND USE
4
4.2
SYSTEM FAILURE
4
4.3
LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMITS (ALARM AND SHUTDOWN LEVELS)
5
4.4
CALIBRATION
5
4.4.1
Frequency
5
4.4.2
Calibration Records
6
5
PORTABLE GAS DETECTORS
6
5.1
ISSUE AND USE
6
5.1.1
Issue
6
5.1.2
Use
6
5.2
GAS TESTERS
7
5.2.1
Gas Tester Level 1
7
5.2.2
Gas Tester Level 2
7
5.3
OPERATION
7
5.3.1
Personal Protective Equipment
7
5.3.2
Test Criteria
7
5.3.3
Test Location
8
5.3.4
Reading Interpretation
8
5.3.5
Handling Portable Gas Detectors
8
5.4
CALIBRATION
9
5.4.1
Before Use
9
5.4.2
Additional Calibration
9
5.4.3
Calibration Method
9
5.4.4
Calibration Records
9
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Gas Detection Equipment
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-201-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 3 of 10
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 DOCUMENT PURPOSE
This Safe System of Work provides the guidelines and procedures necessary to
ensure a safe working environment through the:
controlled and systematic monitoring for combustible gas using:
- fixed gas detection systems
- portable gas detection equipment
regular maintenance of gas monitoring equipment
use of suitably trained and authorised Gas Testers.
1.2 DOCUMENT SCOPE
The contents of this Safe System of Work are applicable on all BP owned and
managed sites and installations in Azerbaijan and Georgia and to all personnel
employed on those sites and installations.
2 RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1 SITE MANAGER
The Site Manager / OIM is responsible for:
formally appointing suitably qualified and experienced persons to carry out:
gas testing
gas testing instrument calibration and testing
ensuring that fixed gas detection systems on the site
/ installation are
maintained in an operational state
ensuring that procedures are in place that ensure gas testing is carried out
wherever necessary.
2.2 AREA AUTHORITY
Area Authorities are responsible for ensuring that gas tests are carried out within their
area of responsibility wherever there is any possibility that combustible gas might be
present.
2.3 GAS TESTERS
Authorised Gas Testers are responsible for carrying out gas tests to the level to
which they are authorised.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Gas Detection Equipment
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-201-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 4 of 10
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
3 GAS DETECTORS (TYPE AND USE)
3.1 ALL GAS DETECTORS
Gas detectors shall:
be used wherever there may be a risk to people or property caused by the
presence of flammable gas
be designed to issue suitable audible or visual warnings that alert personnel
to the presence of flammable gas.
3.2 FIXED GAS DETECTORS
Fixed gas detectors are detectors that are permanently placed at strategic locations,
and where deemed appropriate by local management, to monitor conditions on a
continuous basis. In particular they are placed wherever it is thought that combustible
gas could collect following an uncontrolled and unplanned release.
Note: Fixed gas detection systems may initiate specific safety actions automatically.
3.3 PORTABLE GAS DETECTORS
Portable gas detectors are often used during activities that take place where
flammable gas could exist, for example, in confined spaces. In most cases, the use
of portable gas detection equipment will be called for by the work procedure /
instruction.
4 FIXED GAS DETECTION SYSTEMS
4.1 LOCATION AND USE
Fixed or automatic combustible gas detectors/systems may be used to initiate a
number of automatic safety actions, including:
visual and audible warnings
plant / equipment shutdown
operation of fire extinguishing systems
installation evacuation alarm.
4.2 SYSTEM FAILURE
Any malfunction, abnormal condition, or failure of the fixed gas detection system that
prevents the safe operation of plant and machinery, shall initiate an automatic shut
down of that facility.
Note: When the facility operates on purchased electrical power, shutdown features
must incorporate adjustable time delays to prevent plant shutdown from short
duration power outages. Automatic restart systems shall be overridden by the
shutdown system.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Gas Detection Equipment
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-201-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 5 of 10
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Partially attended sites / facilities (those which are not manned 24 hours a day)
must have suitable provisions incorporated so that affected plant / equipment can be
automatically shutdown for 24 hours without causing damage to the facility.
In partially attended facilities, any malfunction, abnormal condition, or failure of the
fixed gas detection system that actuates a plant or machinery shutdown must also
actuate a visual enunciator. A remote signalling device must be actuated during
unattended periods.
In fully attended facilities, each any malfunction, abnormal condition, or failure of
the fixed gas detection system that actuates a plant or machinery shutdown must
actuate a visual and audible alarm prior to the shutdown. These alarms must actuate
sufficiently ahead of each shutdown point to give time for corrective measures to
prevent a shutdown.
4.3 LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMITS (ALARM AND SHUTDOWN LEVELS)
Concentrations of combustible gases that will trigger alarms and shutdowns shall be
as follows. These are maximum set values. Set points may be lower.
10% Lower Explosive Limit - Low alarm, actuate alarms/enunciator
50% Lower Explosive Limit - High alarm, may or may not actuate
shutdowns, depending upon the capability of the facility.
4.4 CALIBRATION
4.4.1 Frequency
Combustible gas detection systems shall be calibrated in accordance with the
manufacturer’s recommended procedures or at least every 3 months, whichever is
more frequent.
Calibration Gas Tanks
Gas detectors are usually calibrated using gas from a calibration gas tank. It is a
good safety practice to install a tube from floor level to detectors placed at high levels
and ceilings. This permits introduction of the calibration gas through the tubes at
ground level.
The contents of the calibration gas tank are under pressure. Therefore the following
precautions should be observed at all times:
Do not allow oil, grease or flammable solvents to contact the flow control of
the calibration gas tank.
Do not store calibration gas tanks near heat or fire, or in room used for
habitation.
When the tank is exhausted, discard in a safe place such as burial in the
earth or in sanitary landfill.
Do not throw in fire or incinerate.
Do not puncture.
Keep out of the reach of children.
It is not permitted and it is hazardous to refill these gas tanks.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Gas Detection Equipment
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-201-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 6 of 10
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Do not attach the calibration gas tank to any other apparatus other than
described above.
4.4.2 Calibration Records
Records must be maintained on the calibration of these instruments at the site /
installation. Records should include the:
detector location
detector make/mode
detector type
date of calibration
calibration results
name of the person who completed the calibration.
5 PORTABLE GAS DETECTORS
5.1 ISSUE AND USE
5.1.1 Issue
Portable gas detectors must only be used:
in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions for determining the lower
explosive limit of combustible gas in the air
by personnel trained in their use.
Note: On BP sites and installations in Azerbaijan and Georgia this means that
portable gas detectors may only be used by authorised Gas Testers.
5.1.2 Use
Portable gas detectors, or explosimeters, use a set of batteries to measure the
oxidation rate of the combustible gas. This measurement is then read from a meter
showing the gas combustibility.
Portable combustible gas detectors shall be used when:
introducing flame into an area which may contain a flammable atmosphere.
lighting fired heater vessels.
issuing hot work permits.
doing all confined space entry work
leak seeking
verifying gas-free conditions.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Gas Detection Equipment
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-201-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 7 of 10
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
5.2 GAS TESTERS
Personnel required to operate portable gas detectors shall have completed the
training programme for Authorised Gas Tester Level 1 or Level 2 and shall be
formally appointed by the Site Manager for carrying out gas test (see Safe System of
Work UNIF-HSE-PRO-104 Authorisation).
All training will be conducted by qualified personnel only and will be documented and
kept on file.
5.2.1 Gas Tester Level 1
An Authorised Gas Tester Level 1 is authorised to test for the presence of flammable
gas or vapour, toxic gas and oxygen, and in particular to test atmospheres in
‘Confined Spaces’ as defined in UNIF-HSE-PRO-108 - Confined Space Entry
5.2.2 Gas Tester Level 2
An Authorised Gas Tester Level 2 is authorised to test for the presence of flammable
gas or vapour.
5.3 OPERATION
5.3.1 Personal Protective Equipment
Warning: It must be understood that testing an area because there is a possibility of
a hazardous condition, the person conducting the test must be protected
from the potential hazard and be properly equipped with the necessary
safety equipment.
Fire resistant clothing is advisable where it is available.
5.3.2 Test Criteria
Testing procedures must conform to the following criteria.
The test must be valid and accurate which means that the correct instrument
of known accuracy was used in such a manner as to give the true picture.
The person using the instrument must make sure that the instrument is giving
reliable information and that it is interpreted correctly.
The goal of the test is not to show vapours within certain limits but to show the
actual picture of the entire contents of the space. If the presence of a vapour
is indicated, the space or area must be re-evaluated to determine why, and
corrective measures must be taken before work proceeds.
Field calibration records must be documented by the tester. This
documentation should include the serial number of the unit, the date and
results of the calibration and the name of the person performing the
calibration/gas testing.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Gas Detection Equipment
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-201-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 8 of 10
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
5.3.3 Test Location
Location is important because the hazard may be restricted to a small portion of the
entire volume. Therefore, it is important to test the whole volume. If the vapour or
gas has a specific gravity which is different from that of air, there may be lighter
gases collecting at the top of the space while the heavier ones will hug the floor and
collect in pits and sumps.
Note: Most flammable gases are heavier than air and will settle in low-lying areas.
5.3.4 Reading Interpretation
The operator must always watch the meter while testing. The needle can quickly rise
and fall in a high concentration and come to rest on that part of the scale that would
indicate a safe reading, yet in actual fact, an extremely dangerous concentration
could exist. This is particularly evident when strong concentrations of explosive
vapour are in an oxygen deficient atmosphere.
Some instruments cannot be used in oxygen deficient atmospheres. In these cases
detector tubes will be used to give accurate readings.
5.3.5 Handling Portable Gas Detectors
Sampling Hoses:
Select the correct sampling hose for the specific application and always use the
shortest length of sampling hose
(this will minimize the possibility of vapours
condensing in the hose).
Before Use:
Before use, check the:
calibration of the instrument to be sure it is reading accurately.
battery voltage and/or zero adjustment periodically.
instruments for tightness.
Purging:
Whenever a reading is obtained, purge the instrument in fresh air, and take a second
test to be certain of an accurate reading.
Purge the indicator by drawing in fresh air, even if another sample is not to be taken
right away, as this removes any possibility of contamination by corrosive gases in the
combustion chamber.
Restrictions in Use:
Warning: Do not remove the flashback arrestors from the instrument. They
prevent the explosion that occurs in the combustion chamber from
passing back to the mixture being sampled.
Do not sample high temperatures with a cold instrument. Condensation may
occur and give a false reading. Whenever possible, the instrument must be at
the same temperature as the vapour being sampled.
Do not use the indicator for sampling gasoline vapours containing TEL
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Gas Detection Equipment
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-201-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 9 of 10
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
(tetrathylead, liquefied lead additive) unless the indicator has been approved
for this specific application.
Do not let the sampling hose or probe reach into a liquid.
Do not adjust the voltage when a sample is in combustion chamber.
5.4 CALIBRATION
5.4.1 Before Use
Portable combustible gas indicators shall be inspected and field calibrated, in
accordance with the manufacturers instruction, prior to use.
All field calibration tests will be done upwind, in a clean fresh air environment, away
from the area to be tested. The reasons for testing in this area are to ensure:
the instrument is not contaminated and therefore may give false readings.
that personnel are in a safe working environment.
5.4.2 Additional Calibration
If the instrument is to be used numerous times during a shift, it may only be
necessary to calibrate prior to the initial use unless the instrument:
has been dropped
used in a highly contaminated environment
has been subjected to fluid entry
has been subjected to extreme temperature change.
5.4.3 Calibration Method
There are two steps to thorough calibration:
Set the Zero in air and the span using a certified known gas /air calibration
gas.
Perform a function test in the field (a solvent marker will be enough to activate
the alarm on a combustible gas sensor).
Note: Function tests do not replace calibration. Function tests are only used to
confirm operation of the sensor and alarms.
Warning: Using a butane lighter to activate the alarm during function testing is
dangerous
5.4.4 Calibration Records
Field calibration and maintenance records must be documented by operating
personnel and maintained on file at the local field office.
Records must be maintained on the calibration of these instruments at the installation
/ local field office. Records should include the:
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Gas Detection Equipment
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-201-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 10 of 10
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
detector make/mode
detector type
date of calibration
calibration results
name of the person who completed the calibration.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
AZERBAIJAN BUSINESS UNIT
(AzBU)
Safe System of Work:
Hydrogen Sulphide
Issued for
C1
12.10..04
G.Stacey
V.Rendall
use
Rev
Date
Reason for
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by TA
Endorsed by
Issue
Notes:
HSE - SAFETY
Azerbaijan BU Document Reference
Asset Code
Dept Code
Document Type
Sequence No
Revision Code
UNIF
HSE
PRO
202
C1
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 2 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
3
1.1
DOCUMENT PURPOSE
3
1.2
DOCUMENT SCOPE
3
2 RESPONSIBILITIES
3
2.1
SITES
3
2.2
UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGY GROUP
4
2.3
CUSTODIAN
4
2.4
SITE MANAGER / OIM
4
2.5
AREA AUTHORITIES
4
2.6
SAFETY ADVISORS
4
2.7
HEALTH MANAGER
5
3 HYDROGEN SULPHIDE DESCRIPTION
5
3.1
WHERE HYDROGEN SULPHIDE CAN OCCUR
5
3.2
PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF HYDROGEN SULPHIDE
5
4 HYDROGEN SULPHIDE DETECTION KNOWN H2S AREAS
7
4.1
KNOWN H2S AREAS
7
4.2
HYDROGEN SULPHIDE FIXED DETECTION SYSTEM
8
4.3
HYDROGEN SULPHIDE PORTABLE DETECTION EQUIPMENT
8
4.4
AREAS NOT CURRENTLY PRODUCING H2S
8
4.5
OTHER AREAS
8
4.6
GAS TESTER LEVEL 1
9
5 HYDROGEN SULPHIDE PRECAUTIONS
9
5.1
CLASSIFICATION OF H2S RISK AREAS
9
5.2
BREATHING APPARATUS TRAINING
10
5.3
CONTINGENCY PLANNING
10
6 HYDROGEN SULPHIDE FIRST AID
12
APPENDIX A
13
APPENDIX B: DISCOVERY OF AN H2S LEAK OR FINDING A VICTIM OF H2S
EXPLOSIVE
15
APPENDIX C
16
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 3 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
DOCUMENT PURPOSE
This Safe System of Work contains the information and guidelines necessary to
assist in reducing the risks encountered when working with Hydrogen Sulphide to as
low as reasonably practicable.
1.2
DOCUMENT SCOPE
The contents of this Safe System of Work apply to all BP owned and managed sites
and installations in Azerbaijan and Georgia where Hydrogen Sulphide is present or
has a potential to be present. For detailed procedures to be followed during drilling,
well testing and well servicing operations, refer to the BP Drilling Operations
Guidelines (EUR-D-001), Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) Procedures. 1120/GEN.
Note: All personnel working on BP owned sites and installations in Azerbaijan and
Georgia where Hydrogen Sulphide could be present must be made aware of
the contents of this document.
The following Safe Systems of Work may also be relevant to this one, depending
upon the circumstances:
UNIF-HSE-PRO-103 Permit to Work
UNIF-HSE-PRO-108 Confined Space Entry
2
RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1
SITES
Sites shall be responsible for:
Operating in accordance with this document assuring them of compliance.
Establishing a sampling programme to detect any onset of H2S at producing
sites where H2S is not currently present in the well fluids.
Maintaining a recorded system of training for all personnel working in areas
with an H2S hazard.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 4 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
2.2
UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGY GROUP
Upstream Technology Group
(UTG) shall be responsible for the provision of
authorities advice on all aspects of H2S during drilling and well operations.
2.3
CUSTODIAN
The Health Manager is custodian for this document and will:
Maintain this document and co-ordinate any updates
Provide a risk assessment and advisory service, in conjunction with UTG, on
the adequacy of proposed H2S detection and protection methods.
Disseminate relevant lessons learned, within and out with BP
2.4
SITE MANAGER / OIM
Site Managers / OIMs are responsible for:
the assessment and management of health risks on the site / installation
reviewing the Risk Assessment findings and recommendations
ensuring systems are in place to implement and track the actions resulting
from the Risk Assessment
Ensure sufficient monitoring systems and equipment is in place and there is
adequate equipment available on site e.g. Oxygen equipment.
ensuring that mechanisms are in place to communicate the findings,
recommendations and requirements of the Hydrogen Sulphide Risk
Assessment to all relevant personnel (including contractors, visitors, etc).
2.5
AREA AUTHORITIES
Area Authorities shall ensure that:
Hydrogen Sulphide Risk Assessments are carried out before any related
tasks are undertaken or begun
Personnel working under their supervision are aware of the risks involving
Hydrogen Sulphide and are aware of the necessary precautions.
Personnel working under their supervision are trained in the use of monitoring
devices and other protective systems.
2.6
SAFETY ADVISORS
Safety Advisers are responsible for providing technical support, guidance and
advice, whenever required.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 5 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
2.7
HEALTH MANAGER
The Health Manager is responsible for:
maintaining this Safe System of Work
ensuring Company training programmes comply with the requirements of this
Safe System of Work.
3
HYDROGEN SULPHIDE DESCRIPTION
3.1
WHERE HYDROGEN SULPHIDE CAN OCCUR
Hydrogen Sulphide can occur naturally:
in crude oil and gas
during the decomposition of organic materials, including sewage
in de-oxygenated seawater, which encourages the growth of Sulphate-
reducing Bacteria (SBR)
In addition, Hydrogen Sulphide can be produced as a by-product:
while processing hydrocarbons that contain Sulphur
from the chemical action of acids on metallic sulphides; for example, during
the chemical cleaning of equipment containing Iron Sulphide deposits.
H2S is generated by bacteria in seawater, which thrives in conditions of oxygen
deficiency and, together with organic materials as a nutrient, reduces the sulphate in
seawater to hydrogen sulphide
3.2
PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF HYDROGEN SULPHIDE
Characteristics of H2S
Principle characteristics of H2S are:
Highly toxic, colourless, flammable gas which, in relatively low
concentrations, can quickly cause unconsciousness
Approximately
20% denser than air and therefore can accumulate inn
depressions around an area where the gas is present
Has an auto-ignition temperature of 260o C, is flammable in the range of
4.3% to 45% volume in air and burns with a blue flame to produce sulphur
dioxide, which is also toxic
Is highly corrosive to certain metals. In particular, materials containing copper
should never be used due to the possibility of an explosive reaction with H2S
In air, concentrations are measured in parts per million (ppm) on a volume-
to-volume basis. In water, concentrations are measured in milligrams per litre
(mg/I)
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 6 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Toxicity
Warning: Hydrogen Sulphide is highly toxic and can cause unconsciousness and
death at quite low concentrations.
Hydrogen Sulphide is an irritant and an extremely toxic gas, between five and six
times as toxic as Carbon Monoxide. After exposure to Hydrogen Sulphide, symptoms
usually begin immediately:
Low level exposure causes irritation of the eyes, nose and throat
Moderate exposure levels can cause headaches, dizziness, nausea and
vomiting as well as coughing spasms and breathing difficulties within 15
minutes
Higher exposure levels can cause shock, convulsions, coma, and damage
to the heart, brain damage and death.
Very low concentrations of Hydrogen Sulphide can be detected by the offensive
odour of rotten eggs. However, personnel working in areas where Hydrogen
Sulphide is present may become accustomed to the smell because prolonged and
repeated exposure will cause the sense of smell to tire (not being able to smell it,
may mean that concentration of H2S has increased, not decreased). Higher
concentrations of Hydrogen Sulphide can paralyse the sense of smell immediately
and rapid loss of consciousness. Death may result within minutes unless the casualty
is moved to fresh air and resuscitated.
Note: Recent evidence indicates that long-term exposure to relatively low
concentrations of H2S (10 to 30ppm) may affect respiratory efficiency by interfering
with oxygen uptake (anaerobic respiration).
Corrosiveness
Hydrogen Sulphide is highly corrosive, especially in association with moisture or
oxidizing gases such as Oxygen and Carbon Monoxide. Iron and steel are
particularly vulnerable.
Corrosion mechanisms associated with Hydrogen Sulphide include:
general corrosion
pitting
crevice corrosion, including Sulphide Stress Corrosion Cracking which can
lead to sudden and catastrophic failure
Hydrogen induced cracking, also known as hydrogen embitterment
Any equipment likely to be exposed to Hydrogen Sulphide must be made of
appropriate materials, constructed and operated to take account of these corrosion
problems.
Pyrophoric Scale
Carbon steel lines and equipment that carry gas or liquids containing hydrogen
sulphide may develop a layer of pyrophoric scale (iron sulphide) on their internal
surfaces. When these lines or equipment are opened up to atmosphere, oxygen
from the atmosphere will react with the pyrophoric scale to produce spontaneous
burning. If hydrocarbons or other combustible substances are present during this
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 7 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
reaction, an explosion may result.
Warning: A by-product of this oxidising process is Sulphur Dioxide, which is also
toxic.
Whenever such lines and equipment are opened up to atmosphere, their internal
surfaces should be doused thoroughly with water or blanketed by steam in order that
any pyrophoric scale is rendered harmless.
Warning: Equipment and pipe work that has been on sour-gas duty (i.e. contains
more than 0.5% by weight of H2S) should only be opened in one place at
a time unless the pyrophoric scale has been thoroughly wetted. Opening
the system in more than one place can cause through drafts capable of
igniting the scale.
If the introduction of water is not permissible, either due to corrosion potential or the
risk of freezing, a nitrogen purge followed by a further purge with a mixture of 5%
oxygen in nitrogen will allow controlled oxidation.
Pyrophoric scale that has been removed from lines and equipment shall be placed in
a drum and immediately covered with water. It must then be disposed of by:
burying or burning in a suitable area as determined by legislation (onshore
situations)
slurrying with water and storing in sealed drums, clearly marked
‘PYROPHORIC SCALE’, and manifested as dangerous goods and sent
ashore (offshore situations).
Apart from the hazards to personnel, H2S also poses a risk of sulphide corrosion and
hydrogen embrittlement to metals. Protection methods for metals are detailed in BP
Hydrogen Sulphide Technical Safety Aspects Guidance Note GN 91/30 (refer to BP
Engineering Standard GS 136-1.
4
HYDROGEN SULPHIDE DETECTION KNOWN H2S AREAS
4.1
KNOWN H2S AREAS
In cases where H2S is known to be present or may be present in well fluids,
appropriate measures shall be provided to prevent exposure of personnel to this
hazard.
Procedures, especially those relating to breaking of containment, confined space
entry and gas testing, shall be the principle means of protecting personnel. Portable
instruments may be used together with procedures to monitor a potentially
hazardous are in which personnel are present.
The personnel using and relying on the detection equipment shall be trained in its
use.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 8 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
4.2
HYDROGEN SULPHIDE FIXED DETECTION SYSTEM
Note: It is BP policy that the protection of site personnel is primarily achieved by
the safe working practices defined in this document, not by the use of fixed
detectors. However, fixed detection methods may be installed for other
reasons.
Areas where an accumulation of H2S is possible may be monitored by use of fixed
detectors that react to H2S and give early warning of its presence. However, these
should not be relied on to prove the area is clear of an H2S hazard. Personnel should
not approach an area where such a suspected release has taken place unless they
are wearing self-contained breathing apparatus.
Warning: There may also be a risk of ignition and explosion in such a scenario;
if the lower explosive limit (LEL) on H2S or the LEL of other process gasses
has been exceeded, then personnel should not approach the area. Isolations
should be applied remotely.
4.3
HYDROGEN SULPHIDE PORTABLE DETECTION EQUIPMENT
Where a specific risk of H2S has been identified, personnel are recommended to use
portable detectors or wear personal electronic detectors that alarm when H2S
level reaches 5 PPM.
Portable Hydrogen Sulphide monitors must be provided so that in the event of a
Hydrogen Sulphide escape, the extent of the danger can be established.
Chemical sampling methods of Hydrogen Sulphide detection are preferred, because
they are much more reliable than instruments. it is important to ensure that the
detector tubes used to monitor Hydrogen Sulphide are always within the test expiry
date.
Note: Chemical sampling methods are not suitable in certain circumstances; for
example, for confirming that clean air has been reached when escaping
from a Hydrogen Sulphide hazard.
4.4
AREAS NOT CURRENTLY PRODUCING H2S
In cases of producing sites, which at present do not have H2S in their well fluids,
sampling shall be undertaken at defined intervals in order that any onset of H2S is
established early.
4.5
OTHER AREAS
Appropriate measures shall be provided for non-process systems/areas, which have
the potential to produce H2S. These measures shall be determined by suitable risk
assessment.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 9 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
4.6
GAS TESTER LEVEL 1
An Authorised Gas Tester Level 1 is authorised to test for the presence of flammable
gas or vapour, toxic gas and oxygen, and in particular to test atmospheres in
‘Confined Spaces’ as defined in UNIF-HSE-PRO-108 - Confined Space Entry.
5
HYDROGEN SULPHIDE PRECAUTIONS
5.1
CLASSIFICATION OF H2S RISK AREAS
Warning: Notices warning of the presence of H2S and stipulating access
requirements must be posted at the perimeter of medium and high-
risk areas, and at every access point.
High Risk Areas
High risk areas are those areas where Hydrogen Sulphide is likely to be continually
present above the 8 hour Time Weighted Average Long Term Exposure Limit of 5
PPM (see Appendix A) for long periods during normal operations and where routine
monitoring is mandatory.
Note: It is usual BP practice to paint pipe work and vessels containing hazardous
concentrations of Hydrogen Sulphide yellow, or with yellow bands.
In areas where H2S is likely to be encountered, sufficient self-contained (positive
pressure) breathing apparatus sets (working sets) shall be kept for all persons
normally working in that area. Two full spare air cylinders for each set shall be held in
reserve in an open-air safe area. Adequate numbers of 10-minute duration escape
sets shall also be provided.)
If the presence of H2S in the air is suspected or alarm activated, personnel must
leave the area immediately, if possible heading into the wind.
Entry into such areas shall be permitted only under a planned entry procedure and a
work permit. Personnel, working in pairs, must wear self-contained positive pressure
breathing apparatus or an airline. A standby rescue team should be in attendance.
Consideration should be given to the installation of wind direction indicators
(windsocks or flags) in high-risk areas, to aid direction of escape upwind/across wind.
Medium Risk Areas
Medium risk areas are those areas where Hydrogen Sulphide may occur during
certain planned operations and maintenance activities and where monitoring is
carried out during these operations.
Only authorized persons should enter these areas. Work shall be carried out under
permit to work procedures that should list precautions to be taken. The area should
be monitored with portable Hydrogen Sulphide detection equipment during these
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 10 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
activities.
In both the above cases, it is vital that the source of any H2S is clearly identified and
an assessment made of any potential for deterioration.
Low Risk Areas
Low risk areas are those areas where Hydrogen Sulphide is not likely to occur in
normal operations, and if it does occur it will exist only for a short time, e.g. system
malfunction.
Personnel entering low risk areas must be made aware of the possibility of the
presence of Hydrogen Sulphide and the emergency arrangements in force at the
site.
Notices warning of the presence of Hydrogen Sulphide and stipulating access
requirements must be posted at the perimeter of medium and high-risk areas, and at
every access point to them.
5.2
BREATHING APPARATUS TRAINING
All personnel who are likely to work in an environment where there could be potential
exposure to Hydrogen Sulphide shall be given positive pressure breathing
apparatus training (self-contained and air-line sets). Only fully trained personnel
shall be permitted to wear breathing apparatus and they must receive local refresher
training every six months.
Personnel should be trained where and when to remove breathing apparatus after
completing a job since there may still be Hydrogen Sulphide present. They should
either remove the set at a remote location or test the atmosphere adjacent to the job
first.
Training shall also be given in mouth-to-mouth resuscitation and the use of
resuscitation equipment.
On plant where high concentrations of Hydrogen Sulphide are likely, consideration
should be given to the use of escape breathing apparatus sets. These can either be
carried by personnel or located at various parts of the plant.
5.3
CONTINGENCY PLANNING
It is not feasible to provide a single plan for every contingency at every site. Plans
must prepared on a site by site basis, and should cover:
planning for a Hydrogen Sulphide release
personnel training
Hydrogen Sulphide monitoring.
In addition, sites that have a Hydrogen Sulphide risk must have an alarm system that
is understood by all personnel.
If the presence of H2S in the air is suspected, personnel must leave the area
immediately. The Area Authority, accompanied by one other person shall don
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 11 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
breathing apparatus and investigate, by using suitable test equipment, the
concentrations of H2S in the air.
Upon recognition of an H2S gas hazard (e.g. by smell) or on activation of personnel
H2S detectors. As a minimum, the following steps should be incorporated into any
response to a Hydrogen sulphide release:
1. Evacuate the area, moving across wind if possible.
2. If necessary, don an emergency BA escape set to effect safe escape.
3. Do not attempt to rescue other personnel from the H2S area unless equipped
with BA set (leave it to the rescue team).
4. A person outside the H2S risk area should oversee personnel working in an
H2S atmosphere or on equipment where H2S is present.
Reference should be made to Appendix B, for what to do on discovery of an H2S leak
or finding a victim of H2S exposure. (Any accidents/incidents shall be reported in
accordance with Accident and Incident Investigation and Reporting Procedure).
Planning for a Hydrogen Sulphide Release
A site action plan should be prepared showing the location of safe areas according
to prevailing wind conditions. For onshore sites usually three safe Areas will be
defined:
Two areas will be in the open air on opposite sides of the site (so that at least
one will be upstream of any incident). These areas shall be used for
mustering essential personnel.
The third area (at a remote off-site location) will be used to muster all non-
essential personnel.
On offshore Installations, there should be one suitable Temporary Safe Refuge
(TSR) where personnel can withdraw to in the event of a release of H2S. This area of
module should have shutoff dampers on the Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
(HVAC) system to prevent the ingress of H2S.
Protective / emergency equipment should be stored or located near to the two
Safe Areas used for essential personnel. In addition, in areas where H2S is likely to
be encountered, sufficient self contained positive pressure breathing apparatus sets
shall be kept for all persons normally working in that area. Two full spare air cylinders
for each set shall be held in reserve in an open-air safe area. Adequate numbers of
escape sets shall also be provided.
A trained rescue team should be established.
Where operations are being carried out in a known Hydrogen Sulphide area, and
where personnel may be required to wear breathing apparatus, it should be
ascertained that personnel have no obvious medical conditions that might endanger
their health or performance prior to breathing apparatus training.
Training of Personnel
Al personnel shall be informed of the hazards relating to Hydrogen Sulphide and they
shall receive instruction in the correct use of any personal safety equipment,
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 12 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Hydrogen Sulphide detectors, warning systems and evacuation procedures.
Information relating to Hydrogen Sulphide safety measures shall be prominently
displayed at strategic points around the site / installation.
All personnel working in the crew and rescue team should be instructed in basic first
aid procedures applicable to victims of Hydrogen Sulphide exposure.
All ERT and rescue team members should be instructed in basic first aid procedures
applicable to victims of H2S exposure. Training exercises and drills must be carried
out on a regular basis.
Monitoring for Hydrogen Sulphide
See paragraph 4.2 Hydrogen Sulphide Portable Detection Equipment.
6
HYDROGEN SULPHIDE FIRST AID
Symptoms of acute Hydrogen Sulphide poisoning reduce rapidly when inhalation of
the gas ceases. It is therefore vital to get casualties into fresh air and to summon
medical aid immediately.
Casualties should be kept at rest. If their breathing is slow, laboured or impaired,
artificial resuscitation (mouth to mouth or by the use of a mechanical resuscitator)
may be necessary.
Note: Before commencing mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, any gas in the casualty’s
lungs should be first expelled by pressing down on the chest.
Warning: Rescuers must wear positive pressure self-contained breathing
apparatus (BA).
Monitoring the Presence of H2S
Portable H2S monitors must be provided so that, in the event on an H2S escape, the
extent of the danger area can be established.
H2S monitors should be set to current occupational exposure limits i.e. 5ppm.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 13 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
APPENDIX A
Classification of Physiological Responses to Hydrogen Sulphide Classification of
Physiological Responses to Hydrogen Sulphide
Occupational Exposure Standards (OESs) for airborne substances hazardous to
health are controlled by either Long Term Exposure Limits (LTELs) or Short Term
Exposure Limits
(STELs) or both. These are normally expressed as Time
Weighted Average (TWA) concentrations and are calculated in the case of the
long term exposure limit, to restrict the total intake of H2S by inhalation over one
or more work shifts, and to control the effects due to brief exposure of H2S at
higher levels in case of the short term exposure limit. In the case of Short Term
Exposure Occupational Exposure Limits for H2S are defined as follows:
Time Weighted Average Concentrations
The limits refer to the maximum exposure concentration when averaged over an
8-hour day or a 15-minute period respectively.
Long-term exposure limit (the 8 hour Time Weighted Average value) for H2S =
5 PPM (7mg/m3).
In case of the standard 12 hour shift, the long term exposure limits for H2S would
therefore be 8/12 of 5 PPM = 3.3PPM.
Short-term exposure limit (the 15 minute Time Weighted Average value) for
H2S = 10 PPM (14mg/m3).
The way H2S affects people depends on the level and timescale of exposure and
individual susceptibility to the gas
(alcohol in the bloodstream enhances the
effects of H2S poisoning).
It should be noted that the nose is much more sensitive to H2S than detection
equipment.
However, it is less proficient at determining the difference between a small
amount and an amount large enough to impair the sense of smell, therefore the
nose should not be relied on other than as an initial alert to the presence of the
gas.
A summary of physiological responses to various concentrations of H2S is given
in Table 1.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 14 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Table 1 - Physiological Response to H2S
Physiological Response
Concentration
(ppm)
Detectable by smell
0.0025
LTEL (the 8-hour TWA value)
5
STEL (the 15-minute TWA value)
10
Low concentration: possible reparatory effects and eye
About 30
irritation
Loss of sense of smell
About 100
Medium concentration: dizziness, headaches, nausea,
About 500
abdominal pains after 15 minutes, dangerous after 30
minutes exposure, rapidly produces unconsciousness and
death if effective resuscitation is not applied
Rapid unconsciousness followed by death within minutes
Over 1000
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 15 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
APPENDIX B DISCOVERY OF AN H2S LEAK OR FINDING A VICTIM OF
H2S EXPLOSIVE
START
Working In
Known H2S
Area?
No Problems But:
* Learn To Recognise
* Yellow Pipe/Vessels
Potential H2S Sources
* Local Warning Signs
* Pheriphery Warning Signs
* Lookout For Warning
* Fixed/Personal Monitors
Signs
* SSW Special Instructions
* Know How To Use
BA/Escape Sets (And
Their Limitations)
* Learn Correct Methods Of
Resuscitation
(1) Alarm Activated
(>5ppm)?
Find Possible
Carry On
(2) Smell of H2S?
Victim of H2S
Normal Work
(3) Feell Unwell Whilst Working
Exposure
(4) H2S Leak
(1) Leave Area Immediately
(1) Inform 2nd Person to
(2) Warn Others (ie Activate
Advise Proposed
Contingency Plan)
Emergency Action and
(3) Do Not Re-Enter Area
Request Help (ie
Without Wearing Positive
Activate Contingency
Pressure BA
Plan)
(4) Check Area For Other
(2) Don Positive Pressure BA
Victims
(3) Move Victim To Fresh Air
(5) Isolate Source Of H2S
Immediately (Check You Are
Leak If Possible
Outside H2S Release Area
Before Removing BA)
(4) If Victim Not Breating, Start
Rescusitation Immediately.
(5) Ensure Victim Gets Medical
Examination For Side
Effects/Incidental injuries
Raise Appropriate Accident/Incident
Report Document
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Hydrogen Sulphide
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-202-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 16 of 16
Dated: June, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
APPENDIX C
Central Azeri
The potential for H2S to be present in the reservoir fluids has been identified;
therefore H2S detectors are installed at the shale shaker on Central Azeri. The H2S
Alarm consists of GPA audible alarm with Yellow Beacons in high noise areas. In
addition two Red Toxic Gas beacons will be triggered in the effected zone.
There is no voting for these detectors therefore a single low-level detection gives
alarm at fire and gas panel only. While a single high level detection alarms at fire and
gas panel and sounds a H2S alarm via the PA system. Activates Toxic Gas beacons
in the affected fire zone and isolates all plug and sockets in naturally ventilated areas.
In the event of the activation of the H2S detectors personnel must leave the area
immediately, moving across or up-wind if possible. If necessary don emergency BA
escapes set to effect safe escape. Only personnel with suitable breathing apparatus
are allowed to re-enter the area
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/06/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
AZERBAIJAN BUSINESS UNIT
(AzBU)
Procedure for:
Noise Risk Management
Issued for
C1
11.10.2004
G.Stacey
G.Hunt
pp. G. Hunt
G. Campbell
use
Rev
Date
Reason for
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by TA
Endorsed by
Issue
Notes: C1: Renumbered,
HSE - SAFETY
Reformatted and Front sheet
Azerbaijan BU Document Reference
added.
Asset Code
Dept Code
Document Type
Sequence No
Revision Code
UNIF
HSE
PRO
203
C1
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 2 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
INTRODUCTION
3
1.1 Document Purpose
3
1.2 Document Scope
3
1.3 Associated Procedures
3
2
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
3
2.1 Business Unit Leader
3
2.2 Site Manager / OIM
3
2.3 Area Authority
4
2.4 Hearing Conservation Co-ordinator
4
2.5 Health Team Leader
4
2.6 Contractors
5
2.7 Equipment Suppliers and Vendors
5
3
ASSESSING NOISE RISK
5
3.1 Noise Criteria
5
3.2 Noise Assessment Requirements
5
3.3 Noise Exposure Management System
6
3.4 Noise Measurement
6
4
CONTROLLING NOISE RISK
7
4.1 Area Noise Levels
7
4.2 Personnel Work Patterns
7
4.3 Equipment Noise Limitation
8
4.4 Ear Protection Zones
8
4.5 Hearing Protection Devices
9
4.6 Information, Instruction and Training
9
5
MONITORING NOISE RISK
9
5.1 Audit and Review
9
5.2 Audiometry
10
APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS
11
APPENDIX B - NOISE ACTION LEVELS AND CONTROL MEASURES
12
APPENDIX C - NOISE ASSESSMENT FLOWCHART
13
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 3 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
1
Introduction
Document Purpose
This Safe System of Work provides the guidelines necessary for the safe management,
control and reduction of noise levels in the work place so that the risk of noise induced
hearing damage incurred by personnel is reduced to a level that is as low as
reasonably practicable.
Document Scope
The contents of this Safe System of Work apply to all BP owned and managed sites or
installations in Azerbaijan and Georgia and deals specifically with people at work and
noise induced risks to hearing.
Note: This document does not deal with nuisance or disturbance noise.
Associated Procedures
In Azerbaijan and Georgia, BP has adopted the United Kingdom Noise at Work
Regulations (SI 1989/1790), upon which these guidelines are based. These regulations
are more stringent than those normally required in Azerbaijan and Georgia but are
aligned with the rest of BP globally.
2
Roles and Responsibilities
Business Unit Leader
The Business Unit Leader is responsible for:
ensuring that the Business Unit Operates in accordance with this
Safe System of Work
appointing a competent person to the role of Hearing Conservation
Co-ordinator
ensuring that provisions for noise management are in place with third parties.
the maintenance of comprehensive, accurate and up-to-date noise
management records in accordance with this Safe System of Work
ensuring that noise specification is included as part of any new project,
modification of existing plant or purchasing of new equipment
target setting as part of a long-term noise reduction programme.
Site Manager / OIM
The Site Manager / OIM shall be responsible for:
Ensuring that appropriate processes are in place on the site or installation to
assure compliance with relevant noise legislation and associated company
procedures
Note: The principal duty in this regard is to assess personal exposure to
noise and to take such actions as required where exposure to noise
is above the Action Levels defined in Paragraph 3.1 of this safe
System to Work
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 4 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Ensuring that where noise assessment has shown that it is necessary, steps
are taken to reduce exposure to noise as far is reasonably practicable by
means other than ear protection.
Area Authority
Area Authorities shall be responsible for:
Ensuring that all personnel working under their control are made aware of any
noise risk associated with their activities or work place and of the necessary
precautions that should be taken
Participation in noise assessments in their area of responsibility.
Hearing Conservation Co-ordinator
The Co-ordinator’s role is to make the necessary arrangements as outlined within this
Safe System of Work and ensure that these are fully implemented and where
necessary integrated into local safe systems of work.
The Hearing Conservation Co-ordinator, who will normally be the site Medical Officer,
should report to the Site Manager on all aspects of the local hearing conservation
programme including progress with noise assessments, noise control, general
compliance and matters for which management action may be required.
The Hearing Conservation Co-ordinator is the principal custodian for noise-related
records on site, and is also responsible for:
Arranging for noise assessments to be carried out on site
Ensuring a local action plan is in place following recommendations arising from
noise assessments
Ensuring that a mechanism is in place for updating noise assessments
Supporting the Engineering function in ensuring compliance with noise
specifications for all new and/or modifications to plant and equipment
Advising management on progress of actions arising from noise assessments
and engineering appraisal
Arranging for suitable local noise training/information
Ensuring Ear Protection Zones are demarcated and that adequate supplies of
technically suitable hearing protection devices are available
Ensuring that proper records are maintained and that they are accessible to all
who need to know
Ensuring provisions are in place for programme review and audit.
Health Team Leader
The Health Team Leader is responsible for:
Maintenance and periodic review of this procedure.
Providing of technical support, guidance and advice as requested by BUs and
Resource Groups on all aspects of hearing conservation
Provision of sound level surveys or noise dosimetry if it is required.
Provision of audiometry services as part of an ongoing occupational health
programme.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 5 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Contractors
Contractors shall be responsible for:
co-operating with BP in the preparation of a noise control study for any new
plant or modifications to an existing facility in line with BP noise specifications
co-operating with BP to ensure that, in accordance with this procedure, suitable
noise control arrangements are in place, wherever necessary, prior to
commencing activities
providing audiometry screening, where appropriate, for their own employees.
Equipment Suppliers and Vendors
Companies supplying equipment shall be responsible for:
designing and constructing of machinery so that it meets appropriate legislative
requirements and BP noise specifications
providing noise emission information associated with their supplied products.
3
Assessing Noise risk
Noise Criteria
At predefined noise levels known as action levels, specific measures must be taken to
control and/or reduce personnel exposure to noise (see Appendix B). The action levels
given below are related to 8-hour shift periods but equivalent values for 12-hour shifts
are shown in brackets. The peak action level is based on the highest pressure reached
by an instantaneous sound pressure level for any single event.
First Action Level - a daily personal noise exposure of 85 dB(A) for 8 hrs (83
dB(A) 12 hrs)
Second Action Level - a daily personal noise exposure or of 90 dB(A) for 8 hrs
(88 dB(A) 12 hrs)
Peak Action Level - means a level of peak sound pressure of 200 pascals (140
dB re 20 uPa)
These levels can be calculated or measured directly using suitable instruments and
may be expressed as the daily total personal exposure to noise at work, taking into
account the average levels of noise in the working areas and the time spent in those
areas, but taking no account of any ear protectors worn.
Noise Assessment Requirements
Noise assessments:
are required for all regular and foreseeable jobs within the Business Unit
are used to identify job functions that are likely to exceed normally safe limits of
noise exposure as defined in Paragraph 3.1
shall be carried out by a competent person.
This Safe System of Work outlines the two mechanisms, used in conjunction with the
Noise Exposure Management System, employed to ensure that these noise
assessment requirements are met. These mechanisms are:
baseline surveys combined with time and motion analysis
verification by sample dosimetry surveys.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 6 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Noise Exposure Management System
To collate the information required to determine baseline noise exposure levels or
dosage rates, information is gathered on:
the occupancy times of various personnel groups in each site area
the noise levels in each area.
A study is then undertaken using the spreadsheet in the Noise Exposure Management
System.
The Noise Exposure Management System consists of a number of linked
spreadsheets, which take noise data from a basic noise survey, and work pattern
information obtained from supervisors, to produce the noise dose levels for personnel.
In addition to providing noise exposure calculations Noise Exposure Management
System can also provide the following information:
which job functions are most affected by noise
where do they get their noise exposure from
which are the most significant areas in terms of overall staff noise exposure
how many people do these areas affect
what is the effect of hearing protection
what happens when noise levels or shift patterns are changed.
Once a baseline Noise Exposure Management System has been established, the
ownership and responsibility for its management shall lie with the Business Unit.
Noise assessments are repeated at two yearly intervals or whenever there is reason to
doubt their validity, e.g., changes in work patterns, introduction of new
machinery/processes, etc.
Note: The noise assessments shall be carried out by a competent person who is
capable of bringing together enough information about noise exposures to
enable decisions to be made to comply with the regulations and advising on
whether additional specialist support is required.
For BP operational sites in Azerbaijan and Georgia, the competent person will
be the Medic (visiting Doctor on pipeline sites). Additional information can be
obtained from the Occupational Health Team.
Noise Measurement
Site Noise Level Surveys
Site noise level surveys shall be carried out in all manned work areas that are normally
accessible. The measurements should be carried out by a competent and trained
person and involve the use of an integrating sound level meter capable of recording
overall dB(A) and where appropriate peak pressure and octave band noise levels.
Readings should be marked on site plot plans which can then be cross-referenced with
the Noise Exposure Management System spreadsheet.
Site noise level surveys should be carried out during routine plant operation with main
equipment items running at steady loads. Equipment operating and daily production
rates should be recorded. Where appropriate, noise measurement of portable or hand
held power tools should also be made.
Noise Exposure for Mobile Personnel
Where a person is highly mobile and daily personal exposure levels are difficult to
ascertain, noise dosimetry can be used as a means of fine-tuning of the Noise
Exposure Management System and providing verification of the predicted noise
exposures.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 7 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Noise Measuring Equipment
Sound level meters, dosimeters or calibrators should meet applicable European
standards. Dosimeters have no type number but should be certified as intrinsically safe.
All equipment shall be calibrated against a certified standard every two years (including
standard noise sources).
4
Controlling Noise Risk
Where employees are exposed to noise levels at or above the Second or Peak Action
Levels there is a specific requirement to reduce exposure, and the risks from that
exposure, to levels that are as low as reasonably practicable. In particular, this should
be achieved wherever possible, by means other than the provision of personal ear
protectors.
There are three principal areas where this could be achieved:
noise reduction at source (4.1 Area Noise Levels)
reduction of time spent in noisy areas (4.2 Personnel Work Patterns)
purchasing policy, i.e. quieter equipment (4.3 Equipment Noise Limitation).
Area Noise Levels
Investigations Using the Noise Exposure Management System
The possibility to reduce area noise levels should be investigated using the Noise
Exposure Management System to:
identify those areas making the greatest overall contribution to noise exposure
on the site
estimate the reductions in exposure and risk that may result from any
suggested corrective actions.
The information and decisions resulting from such investigations should be
documented.
Note: For technical reviews of noise data, specialist assistance from a noise
consultant is likely to be required. The Occupational Health Department can
assist in sourcing external consultants for this purpose.
Methods for Limiting Area Noise Emissions
Methods of limiting noise generation include:
design of workplaces for low noise emission
substitution of quieter process or machine
engineering control (damping, isolation, silencers, maintenance, etc)
enclosure, screens, barriers and noise refuges.
Site Managers and OIMs should ensure that any measures or equipment introduced for
the purpose of reducing noise exposure are properly used and that their effectiveness
is subject to regular and routine maintenance.
Personnel Work Patterns
Modifying work practices can reduce noise exposure. Where there is flexibility in
planning work, there are a number of ways of achieving such reductions, including:
use of worker rotation to limit total exposure over a shift
exclusion of all non essential personnel
switching off noise source when not in use
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 8 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
avoid using hearing protection areas as access routes.
Any proposed changes to work patterns can be modelled using the Noise Exposure
Management System to predict likely noise reduction on personal dose rates.
Equipment Noise Limitation
A principal and cost-effective long-term measure in reducing noise at work is a low
noise equipment purchasing policy. The introduction of quieter machinery to the
workplace can:
reduce the risk of hearing damage
assist in meeting legal duties to reduce workplace noise
reduce the need for expensive retrofitting of additional noise control measures
improve communications and create a better working environment
reduce stress and improve morale
reduce environmental or nuisance noise.
General Work Areas
The noise limit target for individual equipment items operating in general work areas is
83 dB(A) average sound pressure level at 1 metre. This target shall be attained by
using sound standards, procedures and management systems for the design,
procurement, construction and start-up of BP owned and managed facilities in
Azerbaijan and Georgia. This noise level coincides with the First Action Level for 12-
hour shifts, and is considered to be compatible with the elimination of hearing
protection devices.
Note: This noise limit is regarded as the maximum acceptable level and where
noise levels exceed this limit suppliers will be required to offer noise control treatment
and state the lowest noise levels achievable.
Relief Valves and Flare
Special limits shall be set for relief valves and vents which operate occasionally. Noise
from relief valves should never exceed the 140 dB Peak Action Level.
The flare should be sited such that the noise at positions normally accessible to
personnel, at the maximum emergency flow, should not exceed 115 dB(A).
Ear Protection Zones
Ear protectors shall be worn where personnel are exposed at the First Action Level or
83 dB(A).
All work areas, within which employee noise exposure may exceed the First Action or
Peak Action Levels, shall be designated EAR PROTECTION ZONES.
As far as reasonably practicable, ear protection zones will be marked with signs at all
entrances, and at appropriate places within the zones as necessary. All personnel
entering these zones shall wear ear defenders.
Where it is not reasonably practicable to mark ear protection zones then adequate
alternative arrangements should be made to ensure employees are aware that
protection should be worn. These arrangements include attaching warning signs to
tools and the provision of written instructions for particular tasks (Permit to Work).
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 9 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Hearing Protection Devices
Note: The use of ear protection is a last resort to control noise exposure and should
only be considered where it is not reasonably practicable to control exposure
by other means.
Availability
On all sites and installations, personal ear protectors shall be made available to
employees where their noise exposure is liable to exceed the First Action Level or the
Peak Action Level. The ear protection provided shall comply with the requirements of
Safe System of Work UNIF-HSE-PRO-156 Personal Protective Equipment. in
particular, ear protectors must be capable of reducing noise levels to below the Second
Action Level and will be chosen on the basis of their acoustic performance and user
acceptability.
Manufacturer’s Information
Manufactures must provide information on the noise reduction which can be expected
from their ear protectors, this information along with details of the noise spectra from
noise measurements on site should be evaluated by a competent person to assure that
the correct level of attenuation is provided.
Occupational Health Department
The Occupational Health Department will also advise with regard to the suitability of
hearing protection used within BP in Azerbaijan and Georgia.
Information, Instruction and Training
Where employees are likely to be exposed to noise levels above those provided in
Paragraph 3.1 Noise Criteria in this Safe System of Work, shall be provided with
information, instruction and training on:
risk of damage to hearing
steps to minimise that risk
how to obtain and use ear protectors
how to report defects
employees’ duties under the United Kingdom Noise at Work Regulations (SI
1989/1790) Regulations.
Local arrangements may include the use of leaflets, posters, video and computer
based training material.
5
Monitoring noise risk
Audit and Review
Noise assessment and noise management actions shall be documented and resultant
recommendations placed within a suitable action tracking system. Such noise
management records will require periodic review to track action items, including:
new noise sources addressed
noise assessments up-dated
training schedules met
noise exposure reduction measures actioned and verified.
Targets for continuous improvement shall be established and a process shall exist for
regular self-assessment.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 10 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Audiometry
Audiometry is a means of measuring and monitoring an employee’s hearing during
employment and also a means of measuring the effectiveness of hearing conservation,
and identifying areas where conservation may be deficient.
Audiometry is initially performed on all new starts whose duties take them offshore, or
require them to work in high noise areas. For new starts a second baseline audiogram
will be repeated within 6 months of starting. Thereafter BP policy is to retest at 2 yearly
intervals, unless as specified by the Company’s Medical Advisor.
All audiogram records are kept by BP Azerbaijan/Georgia Occupational Health
Department and/or Medical Service Providers (Azerbaijan AEA International SOS,
MediClub).
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 11 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS
dB(A):
Unit of sound level and noise exposure. A-weighting (A) of the
audible frequencies is designed to compensate for the sensitivity
of the ear. The ear is more sensitive to noise at frequencies in the
middle of the audible range than it is to either very high or low
frequencies.
Dosimetry:
Technique utilising the use of a personal noise instrument
(dosimeter) to continuously measure noise exposure during
normal daily work operation.
Lep,d
A measure of the average noise energy a person is exposed to
during a working day, this is directly related to the risk of hearing
damage.
NEMS:
Noise exposure management system developed by Acoustic
Technology Limited.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 12 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
APPENDIX B - NOISE ACTION LEVELS AND CONTROL MEASURES
Action required where daily personal exposure to
<1st
1st
2nd
noise (lep,d) is likely to be :
Action
Action
Action
level
level
level
EMPLOYER’S DUTIES
General Duty To Reduce Risk
x
x
x
Risk of hearing damage to be reduced to the lowest
level reasonably practicable (Reg. 6)
Assessment of Noise Exposure
x
x
x
Noise assessments to be made by a Competent
x
x
x
Person (Reg.4)
Record of assessments to be kept until a new one is
made (Reg.5)
Noise Reduction
Reduce exposure to noise as far as is reasonably
x
practicable by
means other than ear protectors. (Reg.7)
Provision of Information to Workers
Provide adequate information, instruction and training
x
x
about risks to hearing, what employers should do to
minimise risk, how they can obtain ear protectors if they
are exposed and their obligations under Reg. 11
x
Mark ear protection zones with notices, so far as
reasonably
practicable (Reg. 9)
Ear Protectors
Ensure so far as is practicable that protectors are :
Provided for employees who ask for them (Reg.
x
x
8(1))
x
provided to exposed (Reg.8(2))
x
x
maintained & repaired (Reg. 10(1)(b))
(1)
Used by exposed (Reg.10(1)(a))
Ensure so far as reasonably practicable that all who go
into marked
ear protection zone use ear protectors. (Reg.9(1)(b))
Maintenance and Use of Equipment
Ensure so far as is practicable that :
x
x
all equipment provided under the Regs is used
x
(Reg.10(1)(a))
ensure all equipment is maintained (Reg.10(1)(b)
EMPLOYEES DUTIES
Use of Equipment
So far as practicable :
x
use ear protectors (Reg.10(2))
x
x
use any other protective equipment (Reg.10(2))
x
x
report any defects discovered to his/her employer
(Reg.10(2))
MACHINE MAKER’S AND SUPPLIERS DUTIES
Provision of Information
x
x
Provide information on the noise likely to be generated
(Reg.12)
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Noise Risk Management
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-203-C1
Procedure
Rev No: C1
Page 13 of 13
Dated: October, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Appendix C - Noise Assessment Flowchart
Is noise hazard likely?
(area/equip/task)
yes
Identify personnel with
exposure > 1st Action
Level
no
1st Action Level
Periodic
exceeded?
assessment
yes
Hearing
Conservation
Programme
Ear protection
available, information
and training
no
yes
2nd Action Level
exceeded?
Is noise
no
Provide ear
control reasonably
protection
practicable?
yes
Noise control
Check working
instigated
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/2010
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
AZERBAIJAN BUSINESS UNIT
(AzBU)
Procedure for:
Radioactive Sources Management of Radioactive
Materials and Radiation Generators
Updated
0320.
Elman
C1
and Issued
SSoW WG
G.Hunt
G.Campbell
1009.04
Shikhkerimov
Formatted
for use
Rev
Date
Reason for
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by TA
Endorsed by
Formatted
Issue
Notes: C1: Renumbered and
Formatted
more clarity added.
HSE - SAFETY
Azerbaijan BU Document Reference
Formatted
Asset Code
Dept Code
Document Type Sequence No
Revision Code
Formatted
UNIF
HSE
PRO
205
C1
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/10/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: Radioactive Sources
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Management Procedure
Rev No: 01
Page 2 of 38
Dated: September, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 3 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
INTRODUCTION
53
1.1
Document Purpose
53
1.2
Document Scope
53
2
RESPONSIBILITIES
64
2.1
Site Manager/OIM
64
2.2
Radiation Protection Supervisor (RPS)
64
2.3
Radiation Protection Adviser (RPA)
64
3
CONDITIONS FOR WORK WITH IONISING RADIATION
96
3.1
Work with Ionising Radiation
96
3.2
General Conditions for Work with Ionising Radiation
96
3.3
Risk Assessment
106
3.4
Designated Areas
107
3.5
Controlled Areas
117
3.6
Supervised Areas
128
4
LOCAL RULES FOR WORK WITH IONISING RADIATION
1510
4.1
Storing Radioactive Sources
1510
4.2
Outside Contractors Using Sealed Sources
1510
4.3
Radiography
1611
4.4
Radioactive Sources Used in Well Logging Operations
1712
4.5
Use of Other Mobile Sources
1813
4.6
Use of Installed Sealed Radioactive Sources in Nucleonic Interface Gauges
1914
4.7
Contingency Plans for Incidents Involving Sealed Radioactive Sources .. 2015
4.8
Removal of Equipment Contaminated with Naturally Occurring Radioactive
Material
2116
4.9
Entry into Vessels Contaminated with Naturally Occurring Radioactive
Material
2217
4.10
Contingency Plans for Incidents Involving Naturally Occurring Radioactive
Material
2419
4.11
Transport of Radioactive Material
2519
5
MONITORING FOR RADIATION AND CONTAMINATION
2621
Appendix A
2722
Appendix B
3025
Appendix C
3428
Appendix D
3629
Appendix E
3730
Appendix F
3831
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 4 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
1
INTRODUCTION
3
Formatted
Formatted
1.1
Document Purpose
3
Formatted
1.2
Document Scope
3
Formatted
2
RESPONSIBILITIES
4
Formatted
2.1
Site Manager/OIM
4
Formatted
2.2
Radiation Protection Supervisor (RPS)
4
Formatted
2.3
Radiation Protection Adviser (RPA)
5
Formatted
Formatted
3
CONDITIONS FOR WORK WITH IONISING RADIATION
6
Formatted
3.1
Work with Ionising Radiation
6
Formatted
3.2
General Conditions for Work with Ionising Radiation
6
Formatted
3.3
Risk Assessment
7
Formatted
3.4
Designated Areas
7
Formatted
3.5
Supervised Areas
8
Formatted
3.6
Controlled Areas
8
Formatted
Formatted
3.7
Undesignated Areas
9
Formatted
4
LOCAL RULES FOR WORK WITH IONISING RADIATION
10
Formatted
4.1
Storing Radioactive Sources
10
Formatted
4.2
Outside Contractors Using Sealed Sources
10
Formatted
4.3
Radiography
11
Formatted
4.4
Radioactive Sources Used in Well Logging Operations
12
Formatted
4.5
Use of Other Mobile Sources
13
Formatted
Formatted
4.6
Use of Installed Sealed Radioactive Sources in Nucleonic Interface Gauges
14
Formatted
Formatted
4.7
Contingency Plans for Incidents Involving Sealed Radioactive Sources
15
Formatted
4.8
Removal of Equipment Contaminated with Naturally Occurring Radioactive
Material
16
Formatted
Formatted
4.9
Entry into Vessels Contaminated with Naturally Occurring Radioactive
Material
17
Formatted
4.10
Contingency Plans for Incidents Involving Naturally Occurring Radioactive
Formatted
Material
19
Formatted
4.11
Transport of Radioactive Material
19
Formatted
Formatted
5
MONITORING FOR RADIATION AND CONTAMINATION
20
Formatted
Appendix A
21
Formatted
Appendix B
24
Formatted
Appendix C
27
Formatted
Appendix D
28
Formatted
Appendix E
29
Formatted
Appendix F
30
Formatted
Formatted
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 5 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Document Purpose
Radiation Protection is based on three principles recommended by the International
Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and is described below.
Justification: Every practice resulting in exposure to Ionising Radiation shall be
justified by the advantages it produces.
Optimisation: All exposures shall be kept as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA),
economic and social factors being taken into consideration.
Dose Limits: The sum of all doses received shall not exceed certain limits.
This Safe System of Work employs these principles and, if correctly applied, will
ensure that all exposures to Ionising Radiation and therefore all associated risks are
kept as low as reasonably achievable.
1.2 Document Scope
This Safe System of Work applies to all work with ionising radiation carried out on BP
installations and sites in Azerbaijan and Georgia. Contractors working on BP owned
or operated sites/installations are also responsible for alignment with this SSOW.
Responsibilities are detailed with written instructions that will ensure radiation doses
are as low as reasonably practicable.
This SSOW contributes to compliance with the “HSE expectations” contained in
“getting HSE right”.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 6 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
2 RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1 Site Manager/OIM
The manager of any BP Facility or Site either onshore or offshore has overall
responsibility for the implementation of this SSOW.
2.2 Radiation Protection Supervisor (RPS)
A Radiation Protection Supervisors
(RPS) shall be appointed where any work
involving ionising radiation is to be carried out. At BP operating sites the Safety
Advisors/Officers should be trained to RPS certification. They will exercise
supervision to the extent that any work with ionising radiation is carried out in
accordance with this SSOW. The RPS will review the local rules of any third party
that intends to work with radioactive substances or radiation generators.
To enable them to carry out this role, appointed persons should receive appropriate
training, including a written assessment, at an approved course prior to appointment.
They will also receive suitable refresher training at a period of not more than three
years.
The appointment describing areas of responsibility shall be in writing by the Site
Manager/OIM.
The RPS is responsible for:
Ensuring all work involving ionising radiation is carried out in accordance with
this Safe System of Work
Ensuring all hazards related to work with ionising radiation are identified and
suitable precautions are taken to minimize the risks associated with these
hazards
Maintaining a full and up-to-date record of all radioactive sources that are
under his control and held on the site/installation.
The RPS will make use of the checklist contained in Appendix 3 when a contracting
company brings sources of ionising radiation to the site/installation or when specialist
companies arrive on the site/installation to carry out activities with naturally occurring
radioactive material.
Copies of letters of appointment for RPSs shall be retained at the facility.
2.3 Radiation Protection Adviser (RPA)
The RPA is responsible for providing advice on all aspects of work with ionising
radiation and for evaluating and approving the plans, organisation and arrangements
of specialist contractors. The RPA is also responsible for carrying out an annual
review of work with ionising radiation to ensure doses received by workers, visitors
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 7 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
and members of the public are as low as reasonably achievable. This review will
ensure the accounting system used to record the location and quantity of radioactive
material provides a true record.
The RPA is also responsible for carrying out an annual review of work with ionising
radiation to ensure doses received by workers, visitors and members of the public
are as low as reasonably achievable. This review will ensure the accounting system
used to record the location and quantity of radioactive material provides a true
record.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 8 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
BP has appointed SYNETIX TRACERCO SERVICES as their Radiation Protection
Adviser.
They can be contacted at the following address:
PRIMARY CONTACT:
Graham Wales
Chattan Mews OfficesUnit 4
Suites 1&2
Chattan PlaceThe Technology Centre
Offshore Technology Park
Bridge of Don
Aberdeen AB2311 86GRD
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 1224 222132592527
Fax: +44 (0) 1224 827095212641
Mobile: +44 (0) 7764 836669
Home: +44(0) 1224 732908
E-mail: graham.wales@matthey.com
SECONDARY CONTACT:
Bill Good at the above address
John Lambley, Paul Warren and Andrew Smith
Tracerco
PO BOX 1
G Building
Billingham
Cleveland
United Kingdom
TS23 1LB
Tel: +44(0) 01642 522350 / 375500
Fax: +44(0) 01642 522991
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 9 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
3 CONDITIONS FOR WORK WITH IONISING RADIATION
3.1 Work with Ionising Radiation
The following work with ionising radiation may be carried out on BP
sites/installations:
The use of installed nucleonic gauges
Accumulation and disposal of naturally occurring radioactive material
Work with equipment contaminated with naturally occurring radioactive
material
Use of radiography sources
Use of sealed and unsealed radioactive sources for process investigation and
measurement
Use of well logging sources
The use of casing depth markers
Use and storage of instrument test sources
Use and storage of smoke detectors incorporating radioactive sources.
3.2 General Conditions for Work with Ionising Radiation
Any use of sources of ionising radiation must be justified and measures must be
taken to ensure radiation doses are as low as reasonably practicable. In general this
can be achieved by following basic rules when working with sealed sources and
radiation generators:
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 10 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Most importantly, radioactive sources must never be handled directly:
Use appropriate shielding to reduce the intensity of the radiation.
Maximize the distance between radiation sources and personnel.
Minimize the time spent in the vicinity of radiation sources.
The risks associated with unsealed radioactive material can be minimized by:
Keeping the material contained within vessels or pipe work
Observing good standards of hygiene and housekeeping
Carrying out operations in such a way that material does not become
airborne.
3.3 Risk Assessment
Supervisors will ensure that a suitable and sufficient written risk assessment is
carried out prior to any new applications involving the use of ionising radiation. Risk
Assessment is required in order to identify the measures to restrict the exposure of
employees, contractors or members of the public to ionising radiation. Generic Risk
Assessments for nucleonics and NORM have been provided by the RPA.
The RPS should be consulted if there is any doubt about the requirement for, or the
content of, a risk assessment.
Changes in work activities may result in the requirement for a review of the
assessment.
3.4 Designated Areas
To assist in managing the work with ionising radiation, the RPS will decide if the area
should be designated as a Supervised Area or Controlled Area. Dose criteria for
Designation of Areas are given in the following Tables 11 and 22 (reference to
National Radiological Protection Board’s
“Training in Radiological Protection”
Manual, hereafter called NRPB Tracerco Training manual fro Radiation Protection
section
3, Manual and
“Work with Ionising Radiation;
“Ionising Radiations
Regulations 1999” ACOP and Guidance):
Table 1 Dose Criteria for Designation of Areas
Annual Dose Criteria (greater than)
PART OF BODY
CONTROLLED AREAS
SUPERVISED AREAS
Whole body
6 mSv
1 mSv
Lens of eye
45 mSv
15 mSv
Skin and extremities
150 mSv
50 mSv
Table 2 Annual Dose Limits
CATEGORIES OF
PART OF BODY
DOSE LIMITS
PERSONNEL
Effective Dose
20 mSv (annual)
Employees* of 18 years of
Equivalent Dose - Lens of Eye
150 mSv (annual)
age or above
Equivalent Dose - Skin
500 mSv (annual)
Equivalent Dose - Extremities
500 mSv (annual)
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 11 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Effective Dose
6 mSv (annual)
Trainees aged under 18
Equivalent Dose - Lens of Eye
50 mSv (annual)
years
Equivalent Dose - Skin
150 mSv (annual)
Equivalent Dose - Extremities
150 mSv (annual)
Women of reproductive
Without prejudice to Limits for
13 mSv in any
capacity
both Categories above,
consecutive period of 3
Equivalent Dose for the
months (for abdomen)
abdomen, averaged
Other Persons**
Effective Dose
1 mSv
Notes:
Employee* - is a competent person, certified and authorised to work with radioactive
sources.
Other Persons** - other than Employee or Trainee, including any person aged under
16 years.
3.5 Controlled Areas
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Sealed Sources
Formatted
An area will be designated as a controlled area when one or more of the following is
applicable
i) A prior risk assessment indicates that the person is likely to exceed 3/10 of
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
any dose limit (whole body 6 mSv/y: single organ 150 mSv/y)
ii) The instantaneous radiation dose rate is greater than 7.5 Sv/h
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
iii) A control measure is put in place to ensure the dose to an individual does
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
not exceed 1 mSv/y
Note1 If the dose rate is less than 7.5Sv/h the risk assessment will still need to
prove that
6 mS/y will not be exceeded otherwise a controlled area will be
designated.
Note 2 The closing of a shutter mechanism is seen as a control measure. Therefore
the first person into a vessel with nucleonics attached will do so under controlled area
conditions. He will carry out radiation dose rate measurements, proving the shutter is
closed and then de-designate the area. If NORM is present the area will remain a
controlled area.
Unsealed Material
Formatted
An area will be designated as a controlled area when one or more of the following is
applicable
A prior risk assessment indicates that the person is likely to exceed 3/10 of
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
any dose limit (whole body 6 mSv/y: single organ 150 mSv/y)
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 12 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
A control measure is put in place to ensure the dose to an individual does not
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
exceed 1 mSv/y.
Note1 Any vessel containing NORM will be designated a Controlled area due to the
potential activities and volumes of material.
Note2 Any major containment break will be done under controlled area conditions,
due to the potential activities and volumes of material
Note3 Small containment breaks may, following the risk assessment, be carried out
under Supervised area conditions
Note4 The wearing of respiratory protection could be seen as a control measure
unless the RPS is confident that the risk assessment shows the wearing of RPE is
not to reduce the possible dose below 1 mSv/y.
All Controlled areas must be barriered and a suitable number of notices placed at the
barrier displaying the Trefoil symbol, the legend “Radiation Controlled Area” the
nature of the radiation i.e. Gamma radiography and the hazard - External.
3.53.6 Supervised Areas
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted
Sealed and Unsealed material
Formatted
A Supervised area will be designated, following a risk assessment,
where any person is likely to exceed 1/10 of any dose limit. (Whole body 1
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
mSv/y : single organ 50 mSv/y)
where an area is required to be kept under supervision for purposes of
contamination or possible increased radiation dose rates.
Supervised areas do not require being barriered but must have a suitable
number of warning signs to delineate the area. The signs must display the
Trefoil symbol, the legend “Radiation Supervised Area” the nature of radiation
i.e. NORM and the hazard - Internal.
Note: There is no acceptable level of contamination. Any contamination must
be removed as soon as possible after it is detected.
An area in which employees or visitors can, due to any practice, be exposed to
ionising radiation will be classified as a Supervised Area. Members of the public will
generally be excluded from supervised areas and employees and visitors should only
enter supervised areas if necessary. According to NRPB Manual the Supervised
Area is one whether either:
Conditions need to be kept under review to determine whether it should be
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
designated as a controlled area; or
The exposure of persons is likely to exceed the criteria in Tables 1 and 2.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 13 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
A sign displaying the trefoil symbol and the legend “radiation supervised area” the
type of radiation i.e. gamma, beta, LSA / norm etc and the hazard i.e. internal or
external, will be located at suitable points to demarcate the supervised area.
The conditions inside supervised areas will be kept under review to ensure doses are
as low as reasonably achievable.
3.6Controlled Areas
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Any area in which any individual can, due to any practice, receive an annual radiation
dose greater than 6 millisieverts will be classified as a Controlled Area. Operationally,
an area in which the instantaneous dose rate exceeds 7.5 microsieverts per hour will
be classified as a controlled area. According to NRPB Manual the Controlled Area is
one where:
Persons are required to follow a specified system of work designed to restrict
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
radiation exposures or reduce the risk of radiation accidents; or
The exposure of persons is likely to exceed the criteria in Tables 1 and 2.
For a person to enter a Controlled Area he must be either:
A classified employee
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
An outside worker (i.e. a classified employee of another Company); or
A non-classified person who enters in accordance with suitable written
arrangements that ensure that:
oFor an employee, the dose received is less than that which require
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
designation as a classified person; or
oFor other persons, the dose limits (i.e. those specified for “other persons” in
Table 2) are not exceeded.
Members of the public are not allowed to enter controlled areas.
The RPA can be consulted about the best methods of restricting access to controlled
areas. In all cases the boundary of the controlled area will be clearly marked and
suitable warning notices displaying the trefoil symbol and the legend
“radiation
controlled area” the nature of the radiation (gamma, beta, LSA / Norm etc) and the
nature of the hazard i.e. internal or external, will be located at suitable points around
the designated area.
The purpose of the written system of work for non-classified workers is to ensure the
radiation dose they receive in any calendar year does not exceed 6 millisieverts. An
example of a written system of work is shown in Appendix 2.
If the area has been designated due to the presence of contamination, then everyone
entering the area must wear appropriate protective clothing and facilities must be
available to allow people leaving the area to be monitored and washed and to
dispose of contaminated clothing.
The RPS will carry out regular inspections of designated areas to ensure the local
rules are being fully complied with.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 14 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
3.7Undesignated Areas
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Circumstances may arise where external dose rates are greater than normal
background but less than 2.5 Sv/h. In these cases, the following conditions will
apply:
Personnel will not remain longer than necessary in these areas.
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Basic PPE, including gloves, will be worn if contamination is present.
Note: There is no acceptable level of contamination. Any contamination must
be removed as soon as possible after it is detected.
These conditions are summarized in the Diagram 1 below:
Diagram 1 Procedure for Designated, Supervised and Controlled Areas
Is Dose Rate greater
YES
Stop Work
than 30Sv/hour?
Contact HSE Dept.
Seek Advice from RPA
NO
Measure Dose Rate and Surface Contamination Levels and Designate Area as
appropriate:
Less than 2.5Sv/hour
2.5-7.5Sv/hour and
>7.5Sv/hour
and free of
low volumes and
or high volumes or
contamination
activity of
activity of
contamination
contamination
UNDESIGNATED
SUPERVISED
CONTROLLED
AREA
AREA
AREA
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 15 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
4 LOCAL RULES FOR WORK WITH IONISING RADIATION
4.1 Storing Radioactive Sources
Storage When Not in Use
Formatted
When not in use, radioactive sources must be stored in an appropriate container
locked in a secure store. The following conditions apply to the storage of radioactive
sources:
The store must be used exclusively for this purpose.
The store should be in a low occupancy area away from accommodation and
not near explosives.
The store must not restrict access to the emergency services.
A sign marked with a trefoil and the word
“RADIOACTIVE” must be
prominently displayed at all access points.
Regular surveys must be carried out to ensure the external radiation dose
rate is below 7.5 Sv/h.
The RPS must maintain a full and up-to-date register for all sources held in
the store.
All movements of sources must be logged in and out of the store by the RPS.
All packages containing radioactive substances must be suitably labelled.
Source Security
Formatted
The keys for stores containing radioactive material will be kept under the control of
the RPS.
Source Accountancy
Formatted
The RPS will keep an up to date record of all radioactive sources on the installation.
The quantity and location of all radioactive sources will be recorded as follows:
INSTALLED SOURCES
Once per calendar month
(i.e. nucleonic gauges)
MOBILE SOURCES
Once per day
(e.g. radiography sources)
(Unless in storage when Once per week)
Contractors bringing radioactive material onto BP sites/installations will carry out
checks according to this frequency.
4.2 Outside Contractors Using Sealed Sources
Before contractors bring radioactive sources or radiation generators onto BP facilities
the following information must be exchanged:
A detailed description of the work to be done
An estimate of the total radiation dose likely to arise
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 16 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
The arrangements that will be in place to restrict exposure
The name of the contractor’s representative who will be responsible for the
work
Arrangements in place for receipt, storage and transport of the radioactive
source
Details of the contingency plan that will be invoked in the event of an incident.
Where considered appropriate, the RPS will liase with the RPA over any aspects of
the work to be done.
Details relating to the source(s) must be supplied to the Site Manager/OIM, RPS and
the sponsoring department representative, at least 24 hours before the despatch to
the installation.
These shall include:
Isotope name
Source strength at a particular date
Source identification number
Container number
Transport index
Transport category
Name of Radiation Protection Supervisor
Appropriate transport details, e.g. date, ETD, ETA including Contractors.
Sources must not be left on the site/installation premises unless prior agreement has
been reached with the Site Manager/OIM.
4.3 Radiography
The following instructions must be adhered to in conjunction with all previously
mentioned responsibilities and instructions:
All work involving the use of a radioactive source or radiation generator shall
only be undertaken in accordance with detailed procedures agreed with the
installation RPS under the Permit to Work System.
The contractor shall be responsible for preparing procedures, agreed with the
RPA, which shall include:
o Arrangements for excluding non-classified personnel from the work
site
o A detailed description of the work to be done
o A description of agreed pre-exposure and exposure warnings
o Detailed contingency plans for dealing with any emergency likely to
arise in the course of the work and actions to be taken in the event of
a site/installation alarm.
Descriptions of individual operations must be specific to the work to be
undertaken.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 17 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
At least two contractor’s personnel will be present while radiography is
undertaken. Both will be classified workers and one will be the nominated
RPS.
The contractor shall be responsible for supplying a minimum of two radiation
dose rate monitors and for checking that these monitors are functioning
correctly. A valid certificate of test must be available for each instrument.
The contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that all equipment required in
the case of an emergency is available as agreed with the RPA. The
emergency equipment will include 2 bags of lead shot, remote handling tongs,
a hacksaw or wire cutters, barriers and warning lamps, an audible radiation
monitor, emergency pot and suitable hand tools.
The contractor will be responsible for maintaining appropriate records and for
supplying copies of these to the installation RPS on request.
Where appropriate, sealed radioactive sources shall have a current certificate
of test for leakage of radioactive material and sources should be re-tested
within 24 months of the date of the last test. This requirement does not apply
to sources that are replaced within 24 months period because of decay (e.g.
Iridium 192 sources with 74 day half life).
These are three conditions upon which the Site Manager/OIM and RPS must
be informed immediately:
o A sealed source or container is damaged, lost or mislaid.
o The immediate container or the bonding of a sealed source is broken.
o The radiation level from the immediate container or the bonding of a
sealed source increases significantly above its previous level.
4.4
Radioactive Sources Used in Well Logging Operations
In addition to the instructions detailed above the following instructions must be
adhered to:
All work involving the use of radioactive sources shall only be undertaken in
accordance with detailed procedures agreed with the RPS under the Permit
to Work System.
The contractor shall be responsible for preparing procedures, agreed with the
RPA, which shall include:
o Arrangements for excluding non-classified personnel from the work
site
o A detailed description of the work to be done
o Detailed contingency plans for dealing with any emergency likely to
arise in the course of the work and actions to be taken in the event of
an installation alarm.
The contractor’s local rules should specify any more stringent requirements
and identify specified controlled areas when logging tools are in use.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 18 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
If a neutron source or generator is being used, the contractor must make a
neutron detector available.
Only the contractor’s RPS or other classified persons are allowed to transport
the source to the rig floor.
The rig floor must be cleared of all non-essential personnel until the source
has been loaded into the tool by the contractor’s RPS.
After the tool has been loaded personnel may re-enter the rig floor.
When the log has been completed the rig floor must be cleared prior to the
tool being pulled clear of the riser and the source being unloaded.
On completion of the operation, the source must be returned and logged back
into the radioactive source store.
4.5 Use of Other Mobile Sources
Specialist contractors may use mobile radioactive sources for purposes such as non-
invasive process investigations. The following conditions will apply to the use of
these sources:
All work involving the use of a radioactive source shall only be undertaken in
accordance with detailed procedures agreed with the RPS under the Permit
to Work System.
The contractor shall be responsible for preparing procedures, agreed with the
RPA, which shall include:
o Arrangements for excluding non-classified personnel from the
work site
o A detailed description of the work to be done
o Detailed contingency plans for dealing with any emergency likely to
arise in the course of the work and actions to be taken in the event of
an installation alarm.
Descriptions of individual operations must be specific to the work to be
undertaken.
The contractor shall be responsible for supplying appropriate radiation dose
rate monitors and for checking that these monitors are functioning correctly. A
valid certificate of test must be available for each instrument.
The contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that all equipment required in
the case of an emergency is available as agreed with the RPA.
The contractor will be responsible for maintaining appropriate records and for
supplying copies of these to the installation RPS on request.
Where appropriate, sealed radioactive sources shall have a current certificate
of test for leakage of radioactive material and sources should be re-tested
within 24 months of the date of the last test. This requirement does not apply
to sources that are replaced within 24 months period because of decay (e.g.
Iridium 192 sources with 74 day half life).
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 19 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
These are three conditions upon which the Facilities and RPS must be
informed immediately:
o A sealed source or container is damaged, lost or mislaid.
o The immediate container or the bonding of a sealed source is broken.
o The radiation level from the immediate container or the bonding of a
sealed source increases significantly above its previous level.
4.6 Use of Installed Sealed Radioactive Sources in Nucleonic Interface
Gauges
Radioactive sources may be installed at various locations for level and interface
detection and density measurement. These sources emit penetrating gamma rays
and are housed in lead containers. The gauges are designed, manufactured and
installed to standards that ensure any risks associated with their use are insignificant.
Specific safety information on each of the gauges is contained in the hand over
documentation supplied at the time of installation.
Accounting for Sealed Sources
Formatted
The installation RPS is responsible for maintaining an up to date record of all sealed
sources on the installation. This record must contain the following information:
Name of isotope
Serial number of each source (or other unique identification mark)
Date of receipt
Activity of source at date of receipt
Current location of each source
Date and manner of disposal (when appropriate).
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
This record must be updated every time the source is moved to a new location or, for
installed sources once per calendar month and, for mobile sources once per day (if in
storage once per week will suffice).
Copies of these records must be maintained for two years, or longer if required by
the certificate of registration.
Leakage Tests
Formatted
Sealed sources must be tested for leakage at least once in every
24 months.
Normally this will be carried out by the RPA during the annual audit. Normally this will
be carried out by the RPA during the annual audit. The site/installation RPS must
retain copies of the test results for two years from the date of test.
Routine Checks
Formatted
Once each calendar month, the site/installation RPS will carry out basic checks to
ensure the continued radiological safety of the installed gauges. These checks will
include:
Measure radiation dose rate and check it does not exceed 7.5 Sv/h at
accessible points.
Check the source container is securely bolted to the mounting brackets.
Ensure all warning notices are in place and are legible.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 20 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Check the source is secured in the container with a padlock.
Check that the state of the shutter mechanism is clear and that the shutter
has not been padlocked in the “OPEN” position.
General Precautions for Work in Vessels on Which Nucleonic Interface Gauges are
installed
Warning notices must be displayed on all man ways on vessels on which nucleonic
gauges are installed. Sources must be withdrawn and shutters locked in the “SHUT”
position before man ways are opened. The installation RPS will confirm this has been
done before anyone is permitted to enter the vessel.
Precautions for Vessels Incorporating Nucleonic Interface Gauges
Formatted
During normal operations, the source is retained in a dip pipe inside the vessel. The
fluids inside the vessel provide adequate shielding. If the liquid level inside the vessel
falls it is possible that radiation dose rates outside the vessel will increase. In this
event, the sources must be withdrawn into their shielded container and the shutter
must be locked in the “SHUT” position. The RPS will retain the key and will ensure
that the source is not exposed until the fluid level has increased to the normal level.
For operational reasons it may, exceptionally, be necessary to operate the gauge
with the source exposed above the liquid level. In these circumstances the RPS must
measure the radiation dose rate outside the vessel and designate the area as
appropriate. As a rule of thumb, if the source is to be exposed for more than one hour
the source will be retracted into the housing.
Source Removal
Formatted
Under no circumstances may a radioactive source be removed from its shielded
container. If it is necessary to remove the container from the vessel, either
temporarily or permanently, the RPS must ensure by measurement that the source is
shielded within the container and that the shutter mechanism is padlocked in the
“SHUT” position. The container may then be moved to an appropriate storage
location.
4.7 Contingency Plans for Incidents Involving Sealed Radioactive
Sources
The hazards associated with any job involving the use of sealed sources must be
assessed before the work begins and precautions implemented to minimise risks. In
the unlikely event of an incident, which could result in the conditions for a controlled
area applying or any person being overexposed to ionising radiation, the following
actions must be taken.
Loss of or Damage to Shielding
Formatted
The following actions must be taken in event of loss or damage to shielding:
The person discovering the damage will evacuate the immediate area and
warn others to do the same.
Contact the Site Manager/OIM, Control Room and the RPS.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 21 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
The RPS will attend the scene and ensure all personnel have withdrawn to a
safe area i.e. dose rate less than 7.5 Sv/h.
Erect barriers to prevent access bearing in mind that access may need to be
restricted on the levels above and below the incident.
Prepare a recovery plan with the aim of ensuring that no individual involved in
the recovery receives a radiation dose greater than 1 millisievert.
Advice can be obtained from the Radiation Protection Adviser on how radiation
doses can be restricted. In general:
Keep as far from the unshielded source as possible.
Make use of available shielding materials (lead sheet etc.).
Limit the amount of time spent in the area.
Never handle the unshielded source directly.
In the case of fire, no attempt should be made to withdraw the sources into
their housings or to close shutters if this involves personnel entering
hazardous areas.
In the event of a significant emergency that threatens the lives of personnel or
the continuing integrity of the installation, the potential presence of radioactive
sources should not be regarded as sufficient reason to prevent entry of any
incident team to the affected area.
When the situation has been made safe the RPA will make assessments of
the radiation doses received by those involved in the incident and advise on
notifications to be made to regulatory authorities.
Loss of a Radioactive Source
Formatted
In the event that a sealed source is lost or otherwise unaccounted for the RPS shall
immediately notify the Site Manager/OIM and the RPA. The RPS shall initiate a
search of all likely areas using available dose rate meters. When the source is found
the RPS shall implement a retrieval plan incorporating information from the RPA on
dose limitation and, if necessary, temporary source storage.
All packages leaving the installation/site must be surveyed using a radiation dose
rate meter until the source is found.
If the source cannot be readily found, the RPS shall prepare a detailed report of the
incident and hand over responsibility for further action to the Site Manager/OIM. The
RPA will advise on statutory notifications that must be made to regulatory bodies.
Sources Owned and Used by Third Parties
Formatted
If the radioactive source belongs to a contracting company, the contractor’s RPS will
immediately implement the appropriate contingency plan. The RPS and other
personnel will provide any assistance necessary to make the situation safe.
4.8 Removal of Equipment Contaminated with Naturally Occurring
Radioactive Material
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 22 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
The removal of equipment including pumps, meters, spool pieces etc. that are
suspected, either by measurement or location, of being contaminated must be done
as follows:
Written authorisation must be obtained from the area authority before work
can proceed.
Persons carrying out the work must use the recommended protective
equipment and a suitable floor covering must be used to limit the spread of
contamination.
When containment has been breached, contamination measurements must
be made and the area will be designated as Controlled, Supervised or
released as free for normal work.
Any contaminated item removed from the area must be securely capped at all
open ends using blank flanges, end caps or by wrapping with heavy-duty
polythene and the ends labelled with LSA / NORM tape..
Equipment that requires maintenance in a workshop must be decontaminated
to background level if the work could result in radioactive material becoming
airborne.
Prior to equipment being released from the installation for refurbishment,
disposal or movement it must be cleaned to background level or sent to an
authorised decontamination facility.
Any tools or equipment used must be monitored for contamination at the end
of the operation. If contaminated they should be washed until background
levels are achieved.
The work area should be kept as free from contamination as possible.
Measurements of contamination in the area should be made at regular
intervals. Following completion of the work the area should be monitored
using a contamination monitor and monitoring records should be kept.
4.9 Entry into Vessels Contaminated with Naturally Occurring
Radioactive Material
Specialist contractors who carry out this work shall be responsible for preparing
procedures, agreed with the RPA, which shall include:
o Arrangements for excluding non-classified personnel from controlled
areas
o A detailed description of the work to be done
o Detailed contingency plans for dealing with any emergency likely to
arise in the course of the work and actions to be taken in the event of
an installation alarm.
Clearance
Formatted
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 23 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Written permission (Permit To Work System) is required for opening up or for entry
into vessels, etc. The clearance must give consideration to the use of air tools that
will cause a volume of air to be discharged inside the vessel and hence affect
extraction flows.
Protective Equipment and General Safety
Formatted
All persons entering the vessel must wear suitable impervious overalls, boots and
gloves.
If any dust (or spray containing dust) is likely to arise from the cleaning operation,
breathing apparatus must be worn. Any inhalation of radioactive dust is to be
avoided.
Ideally, surfaces should be kept damp to prevent the production of dust and its
dispersal into the atmosphere. If the only practical last resort is sand-blasting,
burning, grinding or similar to complete a particular task the RPS should, in
consultation with the RPA, assess the best method for radiation protection on a case
by case basis.
Preparatory Work Prior to Vessel Entry
Formatted
Pre-Entry precautions include the following:
A polythene or PVC tent should be erected where required around the vessel
entry point to create a decontamination area. The structure should be such
that any contamination, which is released during entry and cleaning
operations can be contained. The tent should be of sufficient size to allow
capping, cleaning or containment operations to be carried out on
contaminated items. Washing facilities in the form of a water supply,
detergent and scrubbing brush should be provided within the tented area, as
well as storage facilities for personal protective clothing and receptacles for
contaminated clothing.
The tented area shall be designated as necessary. Only classified workers
and personnel working under the written system of work are allowed into a
Controlled Area. A control point must be set up at the entrance of any
controlled area.
Prior to opening any vessel, rigorous attempts must be made to flush away or
remove as much debris, sludge and scale as possible by jet washing, water
washing or steam injections, etc.
All monitoring for contamination should be carried out under the general
supervision of an RPS.
Any tools or equipment used must be monitored for contamination at the end
of the operation. If contaminated, they should be washed until background
levels are achieved. If this is not possible, they should be sealed in strong
plastic bags marked “Radioactive” and retained for future similar use or sent
for decontamination in accordance with local regulations.
The work area should be kept as free from contamination as possible.
Measurements of contamination in the area should be made at regular
intervals.
Following completion of work the area should be monitored using a
contamination monitor. Records of monitoring must be kept.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 24 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
Disposal of Radioactive Material
Formatted
All loose material with an activity greater than background as measured with a
suitable contamination monitor must be disposed of as required by local regulations.
Records of the date of disposal of such waste including its weight and specific activity
should be retained by the RPS in a clear and legible form. Representative samples of
material disposed of must be sent for radiochemical analysis in order to assess the
total activity of the material.
Handling Contaminated Items
Formatted
Any item removed from the decontamination area must be securely capped at all
open ends using blank flanges, protective end caps, or by wrapping with heavy duty
polythene to prevent the spread of contamination during subsequent handling.
Similarly, drums of scale removed during the cleaning operation must be securely
fastened to prevent dispersal of radioactive materials. The outside surfaces of the
drums should be washed to reduce the contamination level on the surface as far as
possible.
Items of contaminated equipment if they should be returned to the vessel should be
capped or plastic wrapped to prevent the spread of contamination prior to their
refitting.
Access to Vessel After Decontamination
Formatted
Once decontaminated to background, radiological restrictions can be removed, good
hygiene practices should still be applied.
4.10
Contingency Plans for Incidents Involving Naturally Occurring
Radioactive Material
Ensuring the material is contained within vessels or pipe work can normally control
the hazards associated with radioactive material. When this is not possible operation,
which could lead to the material becoming airborne or released in an uncontrolled
manner should, as far as is practicable, be avoided.
In the unlikely event of an incident involving naturally occurring radioactive material,
the following actions must be taken.
Spill of Radioactive Material in an Uncontrolled Area
Formatted
In event of spill of radioactive material in an Uncontrolled Area the following actions
must be taken:
The person who discovers the incident must evacuate the area and warn
others to do the same.
Notify the Site Manager/OIM, Control Room and the RPS.
The RPS will attend the scene and establish barriers around the incident.
Personnel who may have been contaminated as a result of the incident will be
monitored for contamination. Remove any contaminated clothing and seal it in
a plastic bag. Any contamination on the skin should be washed away taking
care to ensure material is not ingested.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
Title: RManagement of
Doc No: UNIF-HSE-PRO-205-C1
Formatted
Radioactive Materials and
Rev No: 01
Page 25 of 38
Radiation Generators adioactive
Sources Management Procedure
Dated: SeptemberOctober, 2004
Originating Dept: HSE
The material shall then be collected and disposed of under the direction of the
RPS.
4.11 Transport of Radioactive Material
Radioactive material must be transported in appropriate containers packaged and
labelled in accordance with appropriate national and international legislation. The
following specific conditions apply to the transport of radioactive material to and from
the site/installation:
The Site Manager/OIM must be notified at least
24 hours before a
radioactive source is transported to the site/installation.
The supplier of the radioactive material must ensure he has an RPS on
the installation to receive the material. The supplier’s RPS shall liase with
the site/installation RPS regarding the storage arrangements for the
material.
In exceptional circumstances it may not be possible for the supplier’s RPS
to be present on the installation/site when the material is received. The
Site Manager/OIM may allow the material to be received provided the
supplier has provided detailed written instructions regarding how the
material should be handled.
The site/installation RPS will inspect packages or containers containing
radioactive material and ensure they are correctly labelled and provide
adequate shielding. If packages are incorrectly labelled or if dose rates
are greater than 7.5 Sv/h, they will be placed in a barriered area until
dealt with by the supplier.
The owner of the radioactive material will be responsible for ensuring the
transport of radioactive material from the facility complies with all
legislative requirements. Radioactive material must be packed inside the
appropriate, labelled containers.
Transport of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material
Formatted
Samples of naturally occurring radioactive material or equipment contaminated with
naturally occurring radioactive material are transported as “Excepted Packages”. The
following conditions will apply:
The material must be suitably contained so that it cannot escape from the
package during transport.
The RPS must confirm that the dose rate at the surface of the package
does not exceed 5 Sv/h.
The package must be free of surface contamination.
Note: loose scale other than samples must not be transported onshore.
The controlled version of this document can be found at: http://baku.bpweb.bp.com/dep/hse/safe/
Next Revision Date: 30/1009/2005
Print Date: 24/07/201015/11/200412/10/2004
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING
|
||
|
|
|